SR 05:092 - Laserfiche WebLink

2. Notification of the Zoning Administrator's action will be forwarded to the Planning Commission with a copy of the approval letter, conditions of approval, and reduced cop- ies of the plan set of the proposed house design including colored building perspectives and building elevations, photos of the study model, and the floor plans, landscape plans, grading plans, and/or any other design details considered to be pertinent to the proposed design. This process would provide to the Planning Commission a comprehensive description and analysis of the application and the Zoning Administrator's action. PDR-426 Item 6.c. on the Planning Commission's hearing agenda is the design review application for the first custom home in Mariposa Ranch. Staff mentions it here because it was designed by David Bogstad of Loving & Campos Architects following the proposed design guidelines. V. PUBLIC NOTICE Notices of the Planning Commission's public hearing on this item were sent to the homeowners located within 1,000-feet of the subject property and living in the Happy Valley Specific Plan area. Staff has not received any verbal or written comments pertaining to the proposed project as of the time the staff report was written. VI. PUD DEVELOPMENT PLAN FINDINGS The Pleasanton Municipal Code sets forth the purposes of the Planned Unit Development (PUD) District and the considerations to be addressed in reviewing a PUD development plan proposal or modifications of an approved development plan. Because the proposal would further detail the previously approved design guidelines, would change review procedures of the future house designs, but would not involve a change in density, lotting, etc., staff believes that the proposed modification would be covered by the previously approved development plan findings. Copies of the previously approved PUD development plan findings are attached. VII. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT Environmental review for the proposed project was undertaken with the Final Environmental Impact Report (EIR) approved by the City Council for the Happy Valley Specific Plan in con- formance with the standards of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). The pro- posed modification would be design guidelines and review procedures and, therefore, would not constitute a substantial change to the project or to the circumstances under which the project is being undertaken that would involve new significant environmental effects or that would sub- stantially increase the severity of previously identified effects. Furthermore, there is no new in- formation of substantial importance, which was unknown at the time that the FEIR was ap- Case No. PUD-98-16-3M Page 5 of 6 March 9, 2005