PC 10/11/1995 - Laserfiche WebLink

In response to Commissioner Wright, Mr. Spiliotopoulos noted that there is an easement on the driveway. Mr. Iserson addressed some of the comments of the speaker. The more accurate number is 34 parking spots for the lot. Because no building plans have been submitted for the restaurant, staff could not determine the number of additional parking spaces needed. However, the Municipal Code does not require all downtown parking be on-site. Mr. Iserson also feels the driveway is of sufficient size to handle the one-way traffic as well as provide emergency vehicle access. Regarding the easement, Mr. Beougher stated it cannot be blocked. Mr. Iserson noted that a condition was intended to be added requiring that adequate lighting be maintained in the parking lot. Commissioner Wright agreed with the speaker that the lot looks like it is in need of repair. General discussion ensued regarding paving the parking lot. Mr. Iserson stated that he knows of no other businesses being conducted at the rear of the building. Mr. Spiliotopoulos advised that the business is a janitorial-type business. Commissioner Barker noted that the Coffee Roast business application was having to meet certain parking requirements and this application has none. Mr. Iserson stated that the Code specifically states that new development has to provide parking whereas a change in businesses in an established building does not have to increase parking. Mr. Billings empathized for Mr. Spiliotopoulos's mother, but in good faith, he feels his business will not generate noise problems for the neighbors. PUBLIC HEARING WAS CLOSED Commissioner Dove inquired about the cost of retrofitting the air filter in the future, perhaps it may be more cost-effective to install it now. Commissioner Wright feels that the prevailing winds are such that the filter probably won't be necessary. The applicant would rather take the risk of not having to install the filter. General discussion ensued concerning the repair of the parking lot. Concern was expressed for the expense to the applicant for paving the lot. Speed bumps were thought to be necessary to provide adequate speed control. Commissioner Barker would like to have the broken concrete repaired. Installation of appropriate parking lot lighting and gating were also discussed. Mr. Beougher advised that there is no requirement for the applicant to keep the parking lot open, and if the requirements are too extensive/costly, the applicant can close the lot and the City has no recourse to keep it open. Planning Commission Minutes Page 6 October 11, 1995 .