PC 08/09/1995 - Laserfiche WebLink

Gary Schwagerle, 189 West Angela Street, feels there were implied promises given to the Vineyard property owners. He noted alternatives by Wayne Rasmussen were well received by the land use subcommittee. Ken Chrisman, 1944 Vineyard, would like the EIR to evaluate an alternative that would de- annex the Vineyard Corridor and Ruby Hill from the City. PUBLIC HEARING WAS CLOSED commissioner Hovingh commented that he would like the following considered in the EIR: . the extension of Independence Drive included in the EIR . a fee on future developers for school bus service . a limit of 60 dba maximum limit for front yards. Commissioner Barker commented that she would like the following considered in the EIR: . The schools have a policy for a five minute arrival time. She would like to see a study conducted regarding a staggered start time to mitigate the traffic problems. . Staff develop a listing of alternative uses for vacant parcels other than parks. . Review paving the arroyo pathways for bike safety. . Regarding affordable housing, some type of loan programs to make existing housing more affordable. . Regarding the quarry lands, possible annexation of that area. . Consideration of light rail lines through the business park. . Address moving traffic into the Ruby Hill area through Stanley and Isabel, thereby freeing up traffic from Vineyard Avenue. . Address leaving in and deleting Rose Avenue and Del Valle Parkway extensions. Mr. Swift advised that new maps will be drawn depicting the different alternatives. Commissioner Wright revised one of his written comments on his Page 13 whereby No. 108 would be left as was originally written. In response to Commissioner Barker, Mr. Swift advised that the location of all schools will be reviewed in the EIR. Planning Commission Minutes Page 5 August 9, 1995