PC 071404 - Laserfiche WebLink

l-- Chairperson Roberts did not have a problem with the 50-foot buffer and was disturbed that the antennas were not put on top of DSRSD, which is nowhere near the house. Commissioner Sullivan moved as follows: • to recommend to the City Council that if it decides to reduce the park buffer, it first refer the ordinance to the Parks and Recreation Commission for input and that park neighbors be notified; and • to direct staff to examine the technical issues of collocation and increase opportunities for collocation whenever possible. Commissioner Maas seconded the motion. Mr. Iserson clarified the Commission's desire that this item would go directly to City Council, where a public hearing would be held. If at the end of the hearing, the Council wants to reduce the buffer around the parks, the Planning Commission's recommendation would be to continue the matter, send it to Parks and Recreation Commission, notice the neighbors around the parks, and bring it before City Council again. ROLL CALL VOTE AYES: Commissioners Fox, Kameny, Maas, Roberts, and Sullivan. NOES: None. ABSTAIN: None. ABSENT: Commissioner Arkin. Resolution No. PC-2004-45 was entered and adopted as motioned. e. Discussion and Action on a Letter to the Alameda County Plannine Commission Reeardin~ the Granite Construction Comnany Asphalt Batch Plant Located at the RMC Pacific Materials Pronerty, 1544 Stanley Boulevard Chairperson Roberts advised that she would recuse herself from this discussion. Commissioner Kameny presided over this item. Ms. Nerland presented the staff report, noting that this plant in question was located in unincorporated Pleasanton and that the City did not have direct regulatory authority in this matter. She noted that the City Council would consider this letter at its July 20, 2004 meeting. She described the history of the use and the site. She noted that the Alameda County Planning Commission had scheduled a hearing for July 27, 2004 to be held in Pleasanton Council Chambers, but at Granite Construction Company's request, that hearing has been rescheduled. Ms. Nerland advised that the definition of "nuisance" in the Civil Code states that "anything which is injurious to health, including, but not limited to, the illegal sale of controlled substances, or is indecent or offensive to the senses, or an obstruction to the free use of property, so as to interfere with the comfortable enjoyment of life or property, PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES July 14, 2004 Page 16 of 24