My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC 031004
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
MINUTES
>
2000-2009
>
2004
>
PC 031004
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/14/2017 9:44:30 AM
Creation date
3/16/2005 12:49:33 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
3/10/2004
DOCUMENT NAME
PC 031004
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
10
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Commissioner Kameny seconded the motion. <br />ROLL CALL VOTE <br />AYES: Commissioners Arkin, Kameny, Maas, Roberts, and Sullivan. <br />NOES: None. <br />ABSTAIN: None. <br />ABSENT: None. <br />Resolution No. PC-2004-20 was entered and adopted as motioned. <br />7. MATTERS INITIATED BY COMMISSION MEMBERS <br />There were none. <br />8. MATTERS FOR COMMISSION'S REVIEW/ACTION <br />a. Future Planning Calendar <br />General Plan Update Schedule/Hacienda Business Park <br />Chairperson Roberts wished to discuss the General Plan Update schedule and noted that <br />Mr. Rasmussen had reserved several dates, including Apri122 and May 6, 2004. She <br />suggested that Hacienda be discussed in the middle of the month. <br />In response to an inquiry by Chairperson Roberts, Mr. Paxson advised that there was still <br />work to be done with Planning staff with respect to traffic and transportation analysis. <br />He noted that the model had been tacitly approved for use and that Hacienda was <br />beginning to discuss it. He noted that a general agreement on the parameters would <br />determine Hacienda's appearance date before the Planning Commission. He noted that <br />transit-based mitigation was a key element and added that he had not had enough time to <br />study the matter with staff. He noted that he would be meeting with staff on the week of <br />March 8, 2004. <br />Commissioner Kameny requested that the meetings not be held back-to-back with the <br />regular Planning Commission meetings. <br />Mr. Paxson noted that if the Commissioners wished to hear input on a particular item, he <br />would add it to the presentation. <br />Commissioner Arkin requested that this item be added to the agenda for the next General <br />Plan Update meeting. <br />Commissioner Fox inquired whether the number of stories proposed for residential areas <br />would be discussed. Mr. Paxson noted that all buildings would fit the existing scale of <br />the Park and that nothing would exceed five stories. <br />PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES March 10, 2004 Page 8 of 10 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.