My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC 030404
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
MINUTES
>
2000-2009
>
2004
>
PC 030404
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/14/2017 9:44:15 AM
Creation date
3/16/2005 12:46:36 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
3/4/2004
DOCUMENT NAME
PC 030404
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
13
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Discussion ensued on the Commission's options regarding additional sites, priority of housing <br />types and location requirements, and densities and impacts. The following points were made: <br />• The intent is to meet the Housing Element requirements while keeping numbers below <br />the housing cap as much as possible. <br />^ Pleasanton is almost abuilt-out community, and it is important to get input from the <br />citizens if they want to lower the housing cap before deciding where to put housing. <br />Development cannot be denied on the basis of inadequate school facilities. <br />^ In order to understand what the density would look like, provide models, photos of <br />existing communities, or computer-generated pictures showing development with 15, 20, <br />and 25 units per acre. <br />Small housing units (below 2,000 square feet), including low- and very-low-income <br />affordable rental and market-rate units are encouraged, particularly for first-time <br />homebuyers and seniors. This is preferred to large housing development on hillsides, <br />particularly on the west side of Foothill Road. <br />^ Provide for smaller homes with open space, greenbelts, cabanas, and pools, such as those <br />across from Golden Eagle Farm, for families that are downsizing. <br />Traffic impacts should be addressed so that additional housing does not create additional <br />traffic. <br />^ Construct high-density housing as close to freeways as possible. <br />• Building houses on vacant sites is preferred to redevelopment of existing buildings. <br />^ Concern was expressed that if only affordable housing were built, impact fees for <br />schools, roads, and infrastructure, which are waived for affordable housing, would no <br />longer be available and existing facilities and infrastructure would be impacted; therefore, <br />the need for a balance between market-rate and affordable units. <br />• Since most of the sites presented would not pose many of the environmental impacts <br />normally caused by development, such as loss of trees and wildlife habitat, special <br />attention should be given to the environmental impacts on the residents, such as noise and <br />pollution issues, <br />Encourage more green building and energy efficiency measures in housing; assign a task <br />force from the Pleasanton Energy Committee to oversee these aspects as the projects <br />develop. <br />The 2.5-acre site proposed for the construction of the West Las Positas Boulevard <br />interchange is suitable for affordable housing. <br />PLANNING COMMISSION GENERAL PLAN UPDATE MINUTES, 3/4/2004 Page 9 of 13 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.