Laserfiche WebLink
currently vacant or redevelopable sites which could be utilized to extend traditional high-density <br />housing in the Park; (3) South Bay Bernal Property Site, whose owners are considering the <br />conversion of some or all of its 39-acre office designation to residential (this would require a <br />Specific Plan); (4) North Pleasanton/Hacienda Business Park Intensification Option, which <br />would create amixed-use zone from the BART station to Stoneridge Drive and would establish <br />high-density residential land use in conjunction with office/retail uses; and (5) Miscellaneous <br />Infill Sites, which entails the conversion of smaller vacant or underdeveloped sites throughout <br />the City that are currently planned for non-residential uses into residential use. <br />Commissioner Sullivan inquired if Pleasanton Garbage Service could go far enough east on the <br />Hanson property to provide an azea that would be suitable for housing and if the eastern part of <br />the Hanson property is within the City limits. <br />Mr. Swift explained that El Charro Road would likely be extended through the existing <br />processing plant to the end of the Hanson property. He noted that the area of reclaimed land <br />would not be suitable for residential development but would be for light industrial buildings such <br />as those used by Pleasanton Garbage Service; however, a portion of the property would be far <br />enough from the Station and would be suitable for housing. He further noted that the portion of <br />the Kiewit property that is closer to the Transfer Station would not be suitable for housing as <br />well. Mr. Swift added that a portion of the Hanson property is within the City limits. <br />In connection with possible housing at the Staples Ra,~ch property, Commissioner Sullivan asked <br />where Stoneridge Drive would cross the Arroyo, how much this would cost and from where the <br />funds would come. <br />Mr. Swift replied that the Stoneridge Drive Specific Plan (SDSP) indicates that Stoneridge Drive <br />would be extended to El Charro Road. He indicated that all improvements would be paid for by <br />the Staples Ranch developers through funds that were created in conjunction with the SDSP. He <br />noted that Alameda County and Zone 7 have recently completed improvements to El Charro <br />Road, the construction of two bridges, and the relocation and widening of the channel. <br />Commissioner Sullivan inquired if the housing Staples Ranch opts to build in place of <br />commercial and industrial buildings would pay for the bridge. <br />Mr. Swift explained that should Staples Ranch build homes, it would also need to build the <br />bridge and a street to connect to Stoneridge Drive because existing City policies will not allow <br />any connection to the existing street network in the Fairlands azea, as this would cause traffic <br />volumes to exceed what is allowed on local streets. <br />Commissioner Sullivan inquired if any new housing square footage in Hacienda Business Park <br />would not take away from the existing entitlement for commercial, office, and industrial square <br />footage and if the Park agreement would allow that level of commercial development. <br />Mr. Swift said yes. He clazified that if one of the office buildings were converted to high-density <br />residential, the square footage from that site could be added to the commercial or office square <br />- footage in any other area in the Park. He stated that the current agreement allows only a certain <br />PLANNING COMMISSION GENERAL PLAN UPDATE MINUTES, 3/4/2004 Page 4 of 13 <br />