My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC 030404
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
MINUTES
>
2000-2009
>
2004
>
PC 030404
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/14/2017 9:44:15 AM
Creation date
3/16/2005 12:46:36 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
3/4/2004
DOCUMENT NAME
PC 030404
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
13
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
_ amount of residential use and that any additional residential use would need the approval of the <br />City and the Hacienda Owners Association, adding that the Association would not support any <br />process for residential project that would reduce the total commercial square footage in the Park. <br />Mr. Swift explained that the current plan for the Park allows a certain amount of commercial, <br />office, and industrial square footage and that commercial development would reduce the total <br />more than office or industrial development because retail use would generate more trips than the <br />other. <br />Commissioner Kameny inquired if any of the residential parcels would come with the Hacienda <br />Business Park assessment bonds? <br />Mr. Swift replied that the Park has 30-year bonds and that the City's policy is to have all <br />assessment bonds paid for residential development before any "for sale" houses are built so no <br />individual owners would have assessment obligations. <br />Commissioner Kameny inquired what kind of legal cooperation the City would need from <br />property owners for any General Plan designation change. <br />Mr. Swift replied the City may change the General Plan designation of any property whether or <br />not the property owner is in agreement, with the exception of those properties governed by a <br />development agreement, in which case both the City and the property owner would have to agree <br />to the change. He stated that this applied only to the South Bay Bemal Property and portions of <br />Hacienda Business Park. <br />THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS OPENED. <br />Scott Trobbe, South Bay Development Company, 1690 Dell Avenue, Campbell, requested the <br />Commission to consider a different use for this 40-acre site than for what it was originally <br />approved and look at the flexibility the property may provide to assist the City in achieving its <br />housing requirements in terms of mixed-use high-density housing, senior housing, and <br />apartments. <br />Lou Astbury, 1375 Hearst Drive, stated that be believed South Pleasanton would not be a <br />potential area for development because it would requires access through existing neighborhoods <br />and would require a lot of grading. He suggested that the City build high-density housing in the <br />areas presented earlier. <br />Allison Brooks, East Bay Community Foundation, 200 Frank Ogawa Plaza, Oakland, stated that <br />she was working with James Paxson, Hacienda Owners Association, on a number of alternatives <br />for Hacienda Business Park and would like to hear the Commission's preferences on what <br />direction they should take. <br />Jon Harvey, 3790 Smallwood Court, requested that there be no development in Kottinger Hills <br />and Lund Ranch. He stated that the South Bay property would be ideal for high-density housing <br />- because it is next to the freeway. He continued that the Hacienda Business Park mixed-use plan <br />PLANNING COMMISSION GENERAL PLAN UPDATE MINUTES, 3/4/2004 Page 5 of 13 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.