PC 012804 - Laserfiche WebLink

and noted that the trash enclosures should match the building. She believed that Larry Cannon should review the design. She suggested that angled parking may mitigate the angled building orientation. She wanted to see visuals and agreed that roll-up doors should not be allowed. In response to an inquiry by Commissioner Arkin, Mr. Iserson confirmed that the building could be a two-story design. He noted that there were limited retail opportunities on the second floor but that office uses were possible on the second floor. Commissioner Arkin suggested that on-site storage could be an appropriate use for the second story. He noted that Larry Cannon consistently developed good designs in working with the applicants. Mr. Iserson advised that staff would involve Mr. Cannon in the peer review. Chairperson Roberts advised that another workshop before the Commission would be appropriate for the next step. The Planning Commission recessed for a break at 8:39 p.m. Chairperson Roberts reconvened the meeting at 8:47 p.m. e. PDR-289/PCUP-86, Fairland Investment Inc. Workshop to review and provide comments on the revised building designs of a proposal to develop aself-service gas station, convenience store with alcohol beverage sales, and a "- drive-through car wash facility on a site located at 3121 Bernal Avenue and 3581 Utah Street in the Stanley Business Park. Zoning for the property is PUD-C (Planned Unit Development -Commercial) District. Mr. Iserson presented the staff report and noted that this was a continued workshop from October 2003. He noted that the design had been changed since then, following the Commission's concerns regarding the concept of a gas station at a City gateway. The Commission stated that the design should be less corporate-looking and more neighborhood-oriented in appearance and that it should incorporate some design elements of the nearby fire station. The proposed number of fuel pumps was reduced from ten to eight. The traffic impacts would be evaluated with the formal application, which was not yet prepared. Larry Cannon had performed the peer review. Mr. Iserson displayed the revised design, which incorporated stone and stucco elements and a faux two-story element with tower features and a shed roof. He noted that a wood trellis and an outdoor seating area had been added. Mr. Iserson noted that Mr. Cannon developed a completely different design, which was included in the packets. Mr. Cannon proposed a design that was more residential in character, and instead of a false two-story element, he proposed a hip roof with a building which incorporated stone, columns, trellises, and vines. From a design point of view, staff favored Mr. Cannon's design and believed it was much more integrated in appearance with the residential neighborhood. Staff believed it was more attractive and appropriate for the area. The applicant indicated they were willing to use Mr. Cannon's proposal. Staff believed the three gables were appropriate and PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES January 28, 2004 Page 10 of 17