Laserfiche WebLink
Landscaping and Existing Trees <br /> <br />Individual, site-specific landscape would be reviewed with the future design applications for <br />these lots for conformance to the attached design guidelines. <br /> <br />The tree report attached to the design guidelines identifies five existing trees in fair to moderate <br />health inclnding orchard and non-orchard-type trees. Their evaluation and disposition is cov- <br />ered in the following table: <br /> <br />Tree Species Diameter Height Condition Disposition <br /> Goo~ Condition - <br /> Northern California Black <br />Tree No. 1 38-inches 65-feet Moderate amount Retain. <br /> Walnut (Juglans hindsii) of deadwood. <br /> Remove and re- <br />Tree No. 2 Almond (Prunus amygdalus) 12-inches 19-feet Fair Condition place with a 24- <br /> inch box size tree. <br /> Good Condition - <br />Tree No. 3 Lombardy Poplar (Populus 26-inches 50-feet Minimal amount of Retain, thin, and <br /> nigra Italica) pruning, prune. <br /> Good Condition - <br /> Retain, prune, and <br />Tree No. 4 Pecan (Carya illinoinensis) 14-inches 29-feet Moderate amount fertilize. <br /> of deadwood. <br /> Good Condition - <br />Tree No. 5 Valley White Oak (Quercus 16-inches 30-feet Moderate amount Retain, prune, and <br /> lobata) of deadwood, fertilize. <br /> <br />The tree report's recommendations are reflected in the draft conditions of approval. The appli- <br />cant concurs with these requirements. <br /> <br />Growth Management Allocations <br /> <br />Development of this property would fall under the "First-Come-First-Serve" category of the <br />City's Growth Management program, which has an annual, non-transferable allocation of 100 <br />units. Although past demand for "First-Come-First-Serve" units has exceeded supply in the <br />past, that demand has declined since 2000. Staff, therefore, anticipates that them would be ade- <br />quate building permit capacity for these lots in the future. <br /> <br />Grading/Urban Stormwater Runoff <br /> <br />The North Sycamore Specific Plan encourages split, e.g., stepped, and building pads on sloped <br />property to blend with the natural terrain. The Greenes and Ferreiras expressed concerns regard- <br />ing the visual and privacy impacts to their homes from the future homes on Parcels Three and <br />Four, and requested that low building pad elevations be used on these lots. To meet these con- <br />ceres, the applicants set the pad grades for these lots at the same level as Sycamore Terrace. For <br />example, the maximum building height for Parcel Four - 27 feet - on the proposed pad grade <br /> <br />Item 6. a., PUD-42 and PSP-08 Page 12 of 18 February 9, 2005 <br /> <br /> <br />