Laserfiche WebLink
Commissioner Blank inquired whether unisex restrooms were the standard for such a use. <br />Mr. Knowles replied that it was the least obtrusive, smallest, and most minimal restroom that <br />could be fitted into the existing building without doing major alterations to the historic fabric of <br />the building. He noted that the new steps and handicap access to the building would be added, as <br />well as new signage. He added that there may be some fascia pieces to put on the front and sides <br />of the building exterior, which would be considered after the structural engineering was <br />completed. He noted that they did as little as possible to the building while still meeting the <br />requirements. <br /> <br />In response to an inquiry by Commissioner Fox whether the restroom accessible from the outside <br />would be accessible by wheelchair, Mr. Knowles confirmed that it would be ADA-compliant. <br />He added that there would be room for a small diaper-changing table. He described the features <br />of the exterior of the site and displayed the site plan. <br /> <br />THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS OPENED. <br /> <br />Christine Salidivar, Executive Vice President, Pleasanton Downtown Association, 830 Main <br />Street, Suite A, spoke in support of this application. She noted that the veterans had served their <br />country bravely and well and that it was fitting that they be provided a place to meet that was <br />attractive, safe, and functional. She believed the proposed renovations would maintain the <br />historical integrity of the building, which addresses much-needed revisions to the facility, <br />including the addition of the public restroom. She noted that the PDA was aware of the veterans' <br />concerns and believed they could be addressed and mitigated by adhering to staff <br />recommendations. She noted that the proposed restroom would only be accessible from the <br />outside, and the PDA was amicable to limited hours of operation, such as when businesses are <br />open and during events. She noted that the PDA and veterans were in agreement that they did <br />not want a facility that would be detrimental to Downtown Pleasanton. <br /> <br />Dan Soria, 5420 San Jose Drive, noted that he was past Commander of the Pleasanton Veterans <br />of Foreign Wars (VFW) and that he was on the task force for this project. He spoke in <br />opposition to the restroom design. He noted that they spent a lot of time on the restroom <br />placement and design. He noted that the restroom under discussion would be located between <br />the two meeting rooms that the veterans use on a regular basis and that it should be accessible <br />from the inside of the building; he did not believe they should have to walk to the front of the <br />building to use the restroom. He noted that there were many public use restrooms available in <br />the Downtown area and did not believe this restroom should be accessible to the public at the <br />expense of the veterans inside the hall. <br /> <br /> Larry Jackson, 4106 West Las Positas Boulevard, noted that he was the current Adjutant of <br /> VFW Post 298. He noted that the renovation planning had been underway for four years and <br /> believed that the last-minute addition of a public-accessible restroom was not beneficial to the <br /> original intent of the renovation. He noted that the Veteran's Building was the most-utilized <br /> building by the City of Pleasanton Downtown and that families and other social gatherings took <br /> place there on a frequent basis. He noted that it currently has only two restrooms and that the <br /> typical residential restroom was bigger than the existing restrooms. He noted that the restroom <br /> <br /> EXCERPTS: PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES, January 26, 2005 Page 2 of 5 <br /> <br /> <br />