My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
SR 05:057
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2005
>
SR 05:057
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/18/2005 6:08:33 PM
Creation date
2/24/2005 9:48:11 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
STAFF REPORTS
DOCUMENT DATE
3/1/2005
DESTRUCT DATE
15 Y
DOCUMENT NO
SR 05:057
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
44
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
PDR-402~ City of Pleasanton <br />Application for design review approval to renovate the existing Pleasanton Veterans <br />Memorial Building located at 301 Main Street. Zoning for the property is "O" (Office) and <br />Downtown Revitalization Overlay District. <br /> <br />Mr. Pavan summarized the staff report and described the history and scope of this project. He <br />advised that the project was reviewed and supported by the Pleasanton Downtown Association in <br />August, 2004. He noted that the project issues were outlined in the staff report and that the <br />primary issue was the public restroom on the side of the building facing Old Bernal Avenue; it <br />would be a single, unisex bathroom which was a matter of concern to the veterans using the <br />building. While the public restroom implements the policy of the Downtown Specific Plan, it <br />has raised issues of security, maintenance, and monitoring. Staffis neutral on this subject and <br />believes that the concerns may be dealt with. If the ultimate decision is to not provide the <br />restroom, there are other places where a restroom may be provided, typically on Delucchi Park <br />or Wayside Park. If the restroom is provided, staff believes the issues can be resolved. <br /> <br />In response to an inquiry by Commissioner Arkin regarding the process for this item, Mr. Pavan <br />confirmed that it would come before the City Council because it is a City building. <br /> <br />In response to an inquiry by Commissioner Fox regarding the review of this design, Ms. Eileen <br />Morley, Community Services Manager, Pleasanton Parks and Community Services Department, <br />confirmed that the Park and Recreation Commission reviewed the Master Plan process and that <br />the City Council approved the original Master Plan. The change to consider the restroom had <br />come forward within the last eight months, which had not gone forward to the Park and <br />Recreation Conunission because it was considered to be a Planning Commission issue. <br /> <br />In response to an inquiry by Commissioner Fox regarding the Downtown Specific Plan policy <br />for restrooms in community versus neighborhood parks, Ms. Morley replied that the City <br />Ordinance calls for neighborhood parks to be used by surrounding neighbors and not by the <br />community. Currently, some port-a-potties were located in some neighborhood parks because <br />organized sports use the parks for practices and games. Community parks were reserved for <br />public restroom facilities. The Veteran's Memorial Building is considered to be a community <br />facility, with the caveat from Alameda County that the City would honor the Veteran's Code. <br />The building was completely funded with Alameda County funds and was grant deeded to the <br />City in 1996; the City had been managing the facilities since the early 1970's. No County <br />monies had been put into the building since that time. <br /> <br /> In response to an inquiry by Commissioner Blank whether staff considered security measures for <br /> the restrooms such as coin-operated timers or cameras, Chris Knowles, project architect, replied <br /> that they primarily examined the building design and did not do any thorough research into what <br /> other communities did in general. They examined many alternatives in this particular building <br /> on how to accommodate public restrooms and met with several City departments. This design <br /> was determined to be the least obtrusive. <br /> <br /> EXCERPTS: PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES, January 26, 2005 Page I of 5 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.