Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Chair Barker advised the audience that the Planning Commission has no input to the School District's <br />decisions regarding location, traffic impacts, etc. Further, the public should address such concerns <br />directly to the School District. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />In response to Commissioner Wright, Mr. Van Gelder agreed that if there were two south access <br />points (Valley and Busch Road), the total number of trips would remain at the projected 7,250. <br /> <br />Chair Barker asked what are normal setback distances. Mr. Iserson stated that R-I-6500 zoning has <br />a front setback of 23 feet. This project has a six foot sidewalk and a four foot parking strip <br />(equaling an extra five feet), and a 16 foot front yard measured to the six foot wide porch. <br /> <br />PUBLIC HEARING WAS OPENED <br /> <br />Nate Meeks, Ponderosa Homes, 6671 Owens Drive, commented that the two neighborhood meetings <br />have made the project better and accounts for the very thorough staff report. As background on the <br />project, Mr. Meeks stated Ponderosa has been involved with this property since 1994. During the <br />General Plan process, this site had a maximum density of 565 units. This parcel is considered an <br />in-fill development property and was examined in detail by the General Plan Steering Committee. <br />Ponderosa presented to the City in April 1995, a standard development numbering 449 units. The <br />Steering Committee suggested a number of changes, leaning toward a neo-traditional design. With <br />that, Ponderosa presented a plan that had 394 lots in a grided street layout (very similar to Plan I). <br />This plan was then used as the basis by the Steering Committee's General Plan designation for the <br />property . <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Ponderosa then worked to create Plan I, and presented their plans to the City in April 1996 and met <br />with the neighbors in August 1996 to identify concerns of the surrounding neighborhoods. The <br />overwhelming concern was vehicle access to the site. Plan 2 was developed which brought all the <br />traffic to Busch Road and Valley Avenue. This plan incorporated the 4.8 acre reserve for the OSC. <br /> <br />Mr. Meeks described the various meetings held with staff regarding the specific layout of roads and <br />access points. They believe widening Busch Road to four lanes is an acceptable way of separating <br />the residential traffic from industrial traffic. <br /> <br />Mr. Meeks commented that the neighbors still did not feel the Ponderosa staff made enough progress <br />to allay their concerns over traffic. Those residents who back onto Valley Avenue voiced their <br />concern that they are getting an unfair share of the traffic burden. At this point, it is Ponderosa' s <br />opinion that the Planning Commission and City Council must make a decision on how to distribute <br />the traffic throughout the project. <br /> <br />Richard Frisbie, 109 Baldwin Avenue, San Mateo, spoke on neo-traditional design concepts. He <br />feels it was important to create a visual corridor through the project, and the neighborhood squares <br />cut down the traffic flow through the neighborhood. He is opposed to moving the central <br />neighborhood park because it would take away from the neo-traditional concept. Further, moving <br />the park would be result in a long, thin park along the OSC. Mr. Frisbie feels the frontage streets <br />separating the residences from the OSC is an adequate buffer. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />PIamfng Commission Minutes <br /> <br />Page 9 <br /> <br />December 11, 19% <br />