My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC 11/20/96
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
MINUTES
>
1990-1999
>
1996
>
PC 11/20/96
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/10/2017 4:01:57 PM
Creation date
2/23/2005 4:48:36 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
11/20/1996
DOCUMENT NAME
PC 11/20/96
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
17
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />ROLL CALL VOTE <br /> <br />AYES: <br />NOES: <br />ABSENT: <br />ABSTAIN: <br /> <br />Commissioners Cooper, Lutz, McGuirk, Wright and Chair Barker <br />None <br />None <br /> <br />None <br /> <br />Commissioner McGuirk motioned, seconded by Commissioner Wright, finding that the project <br />has a De Minimus impact on the site's wildlife. <br /> <br />ROLL CALL VOTE <br /> <br />AYES: <br />NOES: <br />ABSENT: <br />ABSTAIN: <br /> <br />Commissioners Cooper, Lutz, McGuirk, Wright and Chair Barker <br />None <br />None <br />None <br /> <br />Resolution No. PC 96-93 was entered finding that the project has a De Minimus impact on the <br />site's wildlife and recommending approval of the draft Negative Declaration, as motioned. <br /> <br />Commissioner McGuirk motioned, seconded by Commissioner Lutz, finding that the revisions <br />to the Stoneridge Regional Shopping Center Development Agreement are consistent with the <br />goals and policies of the General Plan. <br /> <br />ROLL CALL VOTE <br /> <br />AYES: <br />NOES: <br />ABSENT: <br />ABSTAIN: <br /> <br />Commissioners Cooper, Lutz, McGuirk, Wright and Chair Barker <br />None <br />None <br />None <br /> <br />Resolution No. PC 96-94 was entered finding the revisions to the Stoneridge Regional Shopping <br />Center Development Agreement are consistent with the goals and policies of the General Plan, <br />as motioned. <br /> <br />Commissioner McGuirk motioned, seconded by Commissioner Lutz, recommending approval <br />of the draft amendment to the Stoneridge Regional Shopping Center Development Agreement, <br />as proposed. <br /> <br />Chair Barker asked for a friendly amendment to not change the parking ratio. Commissioner <br />McGuirk advised that the rationale given previously for downsizing the parking ratio made sense to <br />him and would rather not change the agreement as proposed. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Planning Commission Minutes <br /> <br />Page 15 <br /> <br />November 20, 1996 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.