My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC 11/20/96
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
MINUTES
>
1990-1999
>
1996
>
PC 11/20/96
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/10/2017 4:01:57 PM
Creation date
2/23/2005 4:48:36 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
11/20/1996
DOCUMENT NAME
PC 11/20/96
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
17
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />ROLL CALL VOTE <br /> <br />AYES: <br />NOES: <br />ABSENT: <br />ABSTAIN: <br /> <br />Commissioners Cooper, Lutz, McGuirk, and Chair Barker <br />Commissioner Wright <br />None <br />None <br /> <br />Resolution No. PC 96-95 was entered approving the draft amendment to the Stoneridge <br />Regional Shopping Center Development Agreement, as motioned. <br /> <br />Even though voting approval, Commissioner Cooper noted he had reservations regarding the traffic <br />impacts if the mall were built out to the maximum. Furthermore, Chair Barker has reservations in <br />her approval vote with the downsizing of the parking ratios. Commissioner Wright also noted that <br />he simply just does not want to see parking structures and an additional 222,000 square feet of <br />expansion. <br /> <br />7. MATTERS INITIATED BY COMMISSION MEMBERS <br />There were none. <br /> <br />8. MATTERS FOR COMMISSION'S REVIEW <br /> <br />a. Future Plannine Calendar <br />Staff and the Commission discussed the current events regarding the neighborhood meetings <br />for the Ponderosa development. Commissioner McGuirk asked that a School District representative <br />be available for the Planning Commission meeting when the Ponderosa application is heard to answer <br />questions about school boundaries. Staples Ranch application will have to be held over until January. <br /> <br />b. Actions of the Citv Council <br />Chair Barker thought Mayor Tarver had requested staff not to process applications until <br />growth management questions were resolved. Mr. Beougher advised that staff has a legal obligation <br />to process whatever applications are submitted. Mr. Iserson expressed that he believes Mayor Tarver <br />was asking the Council members to come to grips with the growth management problems as soon <br />as possible. <br /> <br />Commissioner Cooper noted his dismay about the Council's disapproval of the Shadow Cliffs <br />overnight camping application. He thought it should have been returned to the Planning Commission <br />for further review. Commissioner Lutz also noted that Mayor Tarver was upset that the neighbors <br />would not negotiate and compromise. Commissioner Lutz feels the neighbors are being taught to <br />not compromise and to come to the meetings with a lot of opposition in order to get their way. <br /> <br />c. A.ctions of the Zoninl: AdmiIl.istrator <br />Chair Barker noted that the Rose Pavilion monument sign was approved to be raised five feet. <br />Staff stated there is no height limit in this area; however, the sign height is consistent with other <br />monument signs (seven feet). <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Planning Commission Minutes <br /> <br />Page 16 <br /> <br />November 20, 1996 <br /> <br />I <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.