My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC 11/20/96
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
MINUTES
>
1990-1999
>
1996
>
PC 11/20/96
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/10/2017 4:01:57 PM
Creation date
2/23/2005 4:48:36 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
11/20/1996
DOCUMENT NAME
PC 11/20/96
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
17
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Commissioner Dove stated that with the development of San Francisco property, Dougherty Valley <br />and Tassajara, we may be putting our future in jeopardy if we don't support the ability to grow the <br />regional shopping center. <br /> <br />Mr. Swift stated that this agreement will give the Taubman Company the vested right to have the <br />ability to develop in the future, and these figures are added to the traffic model to insure that <br />whatever comes after (Wells Fargo, Kaiser, Safeway, etc.) will not make the intersection LOS go <br />to "E." <br /> <br />Commissioner Cooper's position is that there is nothing to prevent the Taubman Company from <br />seeking modification of the development agreement in the future when needed. This will preserve <br />the Commission's discretion for the future. <br /> <br />Chair Barker would rather see the mall further developed and de-densify the Wells Fargo agreement. <br /> <br />Commissioner Lutz supports both the revised agreements as written. He found the analysis for the <br />parking and trip generation to be reasonable and conservative. He feels it is in Taubman's and <br />Pleasanton's interest to keep the mall fully operational. <br /> <br />Chair Barker can't support the reduction in the parking ratio but does support the increase in square <br />footage. <br /> <br />PUBLIC HEARING WAS RE-OPENED <br /> <br />In response to Chair Barker, Patrick Gibson commented that the Stoneridge Mall is essentially full-- <br />there is a pad for one more specialty store. The only way to add square footage at the mall is to add <br />onto the existing stores, by building up (but that is already precluded), and by building out in the <br />parking lots (and this would mean the addition of parking structures). He feels the intent of the <br />additional square footage is for the Taubman Company to be able to tell its present tenants that they <br />will have the ability to expand in this mall rather than seeking space elsewhere. <br /> <br />Robert Gibney responded to Commissioner Cooper's comment of coming back when there is a need <br />beyond the 178,000 square feet already approved. It has taken the shopping center twenty years to <br />build-out the first phase. It may take another twenty years to realize the expansions on the other <br />stores. The capital improvements process takes a very long lead time for all the negotiations and <br />secure the commitments. If the mall cannot show tenants/prospective tenants that they have the <br />support from Pleasanton to keep the mall as a regional shopping center, it diminishes their ability <br />to attract them. <br /> <br />PUBLIC HEARING CLOSED <br /> <br />Commissioner McGuirk motioned, seconded by Commissioner Lutz, rmding that the project <br />would not have a significant effect on the environment and recommending approval of the <br />attached Negative Declaration. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Planning Commission Minutes <br /> <br />Page 14 <br /> <br />November 20, 1996 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.