Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Resolution No. PC 96-80 was entered making the POO fmdings and recommending approval <br />of Case PUD-96.15, as motioned. <br /> <br />f. <br /> <br />Determination that the abandonment of Baker Drive is in conformance with the General <br /> <br />Plan. <br /> <br />Mr. Iserson presented the staff report on the abandonment of Baker Drive within the Hacienda <br />Business Park. The PeopleSoft Company is proposing to acquire properties surrounding Baker Drive <br />and Prudential is seeking a minor modification to the Hacienda Business Park PUD to remove Baker <br />Drive and reconfiguring the lots in the area. The City Council will soon consider the minor <br />modification. The Planning Commission must make a determination of consistency with the General <br />Plan. <br /> <br />Staff has analyzed the relevant traffic circulation policies of the General Plan, and they have found <br />the pertinent policies would still be met with the abandonment of Baker Drive. The traffic in the <br />area would still fall within LOS A or B. There would be minimal impact On the adjacent land uses. <br />There have been no responses from the notification to surrounding property owners. The utilities <br />within Baker Drive would become privately owned by PeopleSoft. Staff recommends approval of <br />fmding that the elimination of Baker Drive is in conformance with the General Plan. <br /> <br />Commissioner McGuirk inquired who is responsible of repair of the utilities in the easement located <br />in Baker Drive. Staff stated it would be the responsibility of the property owner. Staff further <br />advised that the utilities are separated from the utilities of the surrounding properties. <br /> <br />PUBLIC HEARING WAS OPENED <br /> <br />Mark Sweeney, 4309 Hacienda Drive, #550, represented Prudential on this application. The <br />application concerning the PeopleS oft Corporation headquarters was recently submitted and is <br />scheduled to appear on the Planning Commission's December 11th agenda. <br /> <br />PUBLIC HEARING WAS CLOSED <br /> <br />Commissioner Lutz motioned, seconded by Commissioner McGuirk, making the finding that <br />the abandonment of Baker Drive is in conformance with the City's General Plan. <br /> <br />ROLL CALL VOTE <br /> <br />AYES: <br />NOES: <br />ABSENT: <br />ABSTAIN: <br /> <br />Commissioners Cooper, Lutz, McGuirk, Wright, and Chair Barker <br />None <br />None <br />None <br /> <br />Resolution No. PC 96-81 was entered rmding that the abandonment of Baker Drive is in <br />conformance with the City's General Plan, as motioned. <br /> <br />PJanning Commission Minutes <br /> <br />Page 14 <br /> <br />October 23, 1996 <br />