PC 07/10/96 - Laserfiche WebLink

. . Mr. Beougher presented the staff report on the compliance of Government Code ~65402 by the proposed public structures of the City and County of San Francisco and Alameda Count)!. . The Code mandates the public buildings have to be in conformance with the City's General Plan, and since no plans have been submitted at this time, the City must conclude that the public structures are not in conformance with the General Plan. Me. Beougher advised the Commission that this is a procedural step in the process of the San Francisco Water Department property design. Staff recommends the Commission cannot conclude the public structures are in conformance with the General Plan. PUBLIC HEARING WAS OPENED There were no comments. PUBLIC HEARING WAS CLOSED Commissioner Barker motioned, seconded by Commissioner Dove, adopting the staff report conclusion that the proposed structures are not consistent with the Pleasanton General Plan as the appropriate report required by Government Code !i65402(b) and authorize the Planning Director to send this report to Alameda County and City and County of San Francisco. ROLL CALL VOTE AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: Commissioners Barker, Dove, Wright and Chairman Lutz None Commissioners Cooper and McGuirk None Resolution No. PC 96-53 was entered determining the proposed public structures are not consistent with the Pleasanton General Plan, as motioned. d. Modification to the DeveloDment A\!:reement for Wells Far\!:? Application for an amendment to the Development Agreement to extend the term by five years, from August 9, 2000, to August 9, 2005; for an amendment to the Reimbursement Agreement to clarify the method and manner of construction and/or payment for certain public improvements required as mitigation measures; and for an amendment to the Development Deferment Agreement to conform its term to the new term of the Development Agreement, for the Stoneridge Corporate Plaza II located east of Stoneridge Mall between Stoneridge Mall Road and Highway 1-680. Continued to July 24, 1996. ,. MATTERS lNITIATED BY COMMISSION MEMBERS Commissioner Wright inquired if anything could be done to the metal roof of the Bank of America building on Stoneridge because it does not look like an aged copper roof. Mr. Iserson advised that staff could ask the Bank to maintain the roof as it was intended to be maintained. Planning Commission Minutes Page 6 July 10, 1996