My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC 05/22/96
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
MINUTES
>
1990-1999
>
1996
>
PC 05/22/96
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/10/2017 4:00:23 PM
Creation date
2/23/2005 4:09:45 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
5/22/1996
DOCUMENT NAME
PC 5/22/96
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
14
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Mr. Beougher advised several of the last speaker's issues were private matters between she and <br />Kaufman and Broad. <br /> <br />Frank Goldstein. 3278 Vermont Place, advised that the arroyo to be filled is directly behind his <br />home. When the arroyo was compacted previously, some of his roof tiles feU off. The situation was <br />rectified, but he is concerned about the length of time he will be inconvenienced by the work in the <br />arroyo. He also is concerned that the aesthetics of the arroyo will be lost. <br /> <br />David Price, attorney representing CalMat, clarified that the comment period is until June 7th. <br /> <br />Joe Callahan, 5674 Stoneridge Drive, responded to some of the homeowners' concerns. He stated <br />it took 3 1/2 years to obtain aU the permits from the Corps of Army Engineers, Regional Water <br />Quality and Control Board and Fish and Game. He described the design and landscaping anticipated <br />in the redesigned arroyo. There is no such improvement elsewhere in the valley. Zone 7 has to <br />accept the deed restriction for the maintenance and control of the creek. Mr. Callahan feels wildlife <br />will relocate to the arroyo area. He also assured the neighbors that they will not be inconvenienced <br />with the arroyo work as they may have been during the Somerset development. He also feels the <br />landscaping and berming behind their backyards will provide sufficient screening. Mr. Callahan <br />stated statistically there is no danger posed by the location of the airport to the park and housing. <br /> <br />In response to Commissioner Cooper, Mr. Callahan advised that by 1999 new Federal regulations <br />will become effective which prohibit the noisier aircraft engines. Mr. Callahan advised that the <br />Livermore airport has the same safety zone distances as the San Francisco and Oakland airports. <br /> <br />Paul Lopez advised Kaufman and Broad will hold a neighborhood meeting to respond to the <br />neighbors' concerns on May 30th, at the Hilton Hotel, from 6:30 p.m. to 9:30 p.m. He also stated <br />that Kaufman and Broad will be involved in some sense with the park and industrial components of <br />the project. <br /> <br />Sally Becks, 3326 Vermont Place, spoke about the airport noise, stating the planes do not follow the <br />flight path and subsequently fly right over her house. Complaining to the airport tower only rectifies <br />the situation for a few days. <br /> <br />Geert Van Looy, 3404 Vermont Place, advised that when the winds change and during the winter <br />time, planes land to the east and fly over his home very low (less than 1000 feet). He is concerned <br />about the potential for crashes in the development during takeoffs and landings. He also stated he <br />was originally told that this area was zoned for a day use park. <br /> <br />Paul Lopez commented that he believes Kaufman and Broad is attempting to involve the community <br />at aU levels with respect to this project. <br /> <br />Joe Callahan advised the California Somerset homes are the fIrst built in Pleasanton with noise <br />mitigating features, and in a visit to the Livermore airport tower, there has not been one noise <br />complaint call from these homes. It is his opinion that any home built within the Specific Plan area <br />should be built with these mitigations, but many have not been. The current project will be built <br />with even more sophisticated noise mitigation measures. <br /> <br />Planning Commission Minutes <br /> <br />Page 12 <br /> <br />May 22, 1996 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.