My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC 05/06/96
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
MINUTES
>
1990-1999
>
1996
>
PC 05/06/96
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/6/2013 12:14:01 PM
Creation date
2/23/2005 4:02:42 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
5/6/1996
DOCUMENT NAME
PC 5/6/96
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
11
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br /> <br />" <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Mr. Beougher thinks that the Commission could recommend such a change in calculation <br />method. <br /> <br /> <br />Commissioner Barker asked staff what the Medium Density Residential ranges of other cities <br />are. Mr. Rasmussen advised that Medium Density Residential ranges vary but generall)! are live <br />to twelve or fifteen units per acre; High Density Residential cuts in at 15-18 units. Staff advised <br />that the R-I-6,500 zoning equals five units per acre. <br /> <br />The Commission, with the exception of Commissioner Barker, agreed with the staff <br />recommendation. Commissioner Barker wants to change the density definitions. <br /> <br />Commissioner Hovingh recommended a twofold action - that the affordable housing fee be <br />based on square footage of the lots and square footage of the house. Mr. Beougher advised that <br />the City would have to do a study. The Commission is recommending that this concept be <br />studied. Commissioner McGuirk would like more details on this issue before agreeing. <br /> <br />Mr. Rasmussen said that a program could be written to state that the fee could be written in such <br />a way. It would provide a process to look at it. <br /> <br />Chanter bv Chanter Review <br /> <br />The Commission approved of the proposed Errata listing, Attachment 3 of the May 6, 1996 Staff <br />. Report. <br /> <br />Chanter I. Introduction <br /> <br />Page 1-5: Regarding racial and ethnic diversity, Commissioner Wright does not feel that ethnic <br />diversity needs to be included in the General Plan. <br /> <br />Commissioner Hovingh disagreed and suggested a broadening of the concept, suggesting it be <br />reworded as follows: "P1easanton welcomes cultural, ethnic, economic, and racial diversity." <br />Commissioner McGuirk concurred. Commissioner Barker and Chairman Lutz approve of both <br />the wording of the General Plan regarding racial and cultural diversity as well as the suggested <br />change. Consensus was to change the last sentence to Commissioner Hovingh's suggestion. <br /> <br />Chanter II. Land Use Element <br /> <br />Page 11-2, third full paragraph: Commissioner Hovingh would like to change "the retnainder" <br />to a percentage figure (50 percent). Commissioner Wright and Chairman Lutz agreed. <br /> <br />Page 11-9: Commissioner Hovingh noted that the density for Happy Valley was previously <br />changed to one unit per two-acre density. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Planning Commission Minutes <br /> <br />Page 7 <br /> <br />May 6, 1996 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.