PC 04/24/96 - Laserfiche WebLink

. . . Commissioner Wright motioned, seconded by Commissioner Barker, making the Conditional Use Permit findings and approving Case UP-96-12 subject to the conditions Iml~11 in BlWibil IS, witb tbe following modifications; Condition 1: The hours of operation for the church shall be modified as follows: Fridays, 8:00 p.m. to 10:30 p.m. for a trial period of six months. If complaints are received, hours shall be reverted back to the original Use Permit time (9:30 p.m.). Condition 2: Modify Condition 6 to allow use of the rear emergency exits for ingress/egress until 6:00 p.m. ROLL CALL VOTE AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: Commissioners Barker, Wright, and Chairman Lutz Commissioners Hovingh and McGuirk None None Resolution No, PC 96-23 was entered approving Case UP-96-12, as motioned. c. UP-94-24, Patricia McInernev Application for a conditional use permit to establish a secondary unit within an existing detached structure located at 1133 Arak Court. Zoning for the property is R-I-6,500 (Single-Family Residential) District. Mr. Otto presented the staff report on the application for a conditional use permit to establish a second unit within an existing detached structure located at 1133 Arak Court. Mr. Otto recapped the history of this structure. A building permit was issued in July 1976 to build a detached garage; in November, 1988, a building permit was issued to convert the garage into living space minus a kitchen (the addition of a kitchen required a use permit). However, a kitchen was installed, making it an illegal second unit. Since March 1994, the applicant and her sister (co-property owner) have been unable to agree on the use of the property. In March, 1996, staff received a completed use permit application. During the interim, however, the residents of the second unit had several narcotics-related problems with the Pleasanton Police. The applicant is now attempting to evict these tenants. Since the public noticing, staff has received complaints from surrounding residents concerning the illegal activities of the tenants of the second unit. An illegal shed erected by the second unit tenants will be removed once the current tenants vacate the property. Staff feels the secondary unit meets the State requirements for secondary units as well as the conditional use permit fmdings, and recommends the approval of Case UP-94-24, subject to the conditions of approval. Planning Commission Minutes Page 4 April 24, 1996