PC 02/28/96 - Laserfiche WebLink

. . . 2. No Trespassing signs to be installed at the entrances to, and inside the 52-space eastern parking lot. 3. Requiring that keys to the parking lot gate be kept by property owner/management and security personnel only. 4. Requiring the property owners to offer to the neighbors to install lattice panel extensions to the top of the existing masonry wall. 5. Requiring that new trees be installed in the 20 ft. wide planter strip and a new landscape plan submitted to staff and the neighbors for review and approval. 6. Amend Condition of Approval No.9 to allow a light standard to be installed within the center parking lot planter. 7. Amend the allowed uses of Building 5 per the attached Exhibit B. The remaining issue is that of the parking lot gate hours and the hours of operation of La Petite Academy. Staff feels the gate closure hours should remain at 6:30 a.m. to 7:30 p.m. This condition was in effect before the daycare came to this location. Staff recognizes the importance of day care centers in the community, however, the day care can still continue to operate with the parents walking their children through the closed parking lot to the day care facility. In conclusion, staff recommends approval of Case PUD-85-10-4M subject to the conditions listed in Exhibit A. Commissioner Wright inquired if some of the deleted uses for Building 5 could be added as conditionally permitted uses. Staff was attempting to limit conditional uses so that the neighbors did not have to continually come to public hearings to voice their opposition. Regarding Commissioner Barker's inquiry about the gate hours, Mr. Iserson believes that at the original PUD hearings the gate hours were established and approved and that La Petite Academy would have to honor those hours. In response to Commissioner Barker, Mr. Iserson explained that the original recommendation of the Planning Commission was that Building 5 should be office use only. However, the City Council changed the recommendation to a mixed use. When advertised in the Public Notices, the wrong recommendation was printed (that of the Planning Commission). It was not corrected until 1993. Commissioner Hovingh pointed out two evening hours businesses that were left in the permitted uses, that of barber shops and eating shops, He surmised that the neighbors would not like the noise coming from an ice cream shop on a summer evening. Planning Commission Minutes Page 11 February 28, 1996