Laserfiche WebLink
<br />, <br />(' <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Betty Moreira, 558 Sycamore Road, advised the Commission that she has lived in her home for <br />21 years and have never been bothered by traffic noise. However, she feels that noise will be <br />a problem with" A" Street and that will impact her privacy. She further stated that she is in <br />support of the plan, only if appropriate deals are worked out with Greenbriar. She noted that <br />more than Ih of the road will be on her property. She also feels that it would be unfair for her <br />to have to pay development costs for her existing home if she decides in the future to sub-divide <br />her property. <br /> <br /> <br />Bill Howell, 6651 Alisal Street, stated that although his property is not affected by the plan, he <br />does not understand the options for "A" Street. However, he commented that a traffic round <br />is equal to a stop sign. He feels that Sycamore Road should be changed as little as possible and <br />recommended that a "Y" divider be placed at the East-West collector, which would give the <br />Greene's the visibility that they are so concerned about. <br /> <br />Marcia Lydiksen, 5795 San Antonio Street, stated that she has lived in her home for 17 years. <br />She reminded the Commission that she is requesting that the developer be limited to a single- <br />story home on Lot 13. She noted that she has a swimming pool and spa in her back yard and <br />feels that her privacy will be greatly affected because a two story home would "look straight <br />down" into her back yard. She also reported that a two-story home on Lot 13 would block her <br />only view of the range. She presented the Commission with a petition signed by neighbors who <br />support single-story homes on Lots 12 and 13, noting that staff is also supporting her position. <br /> <br />Anne Greene, 386 Sycamore Road, responded to comments made by Mr. Severini and Mr. Bach <br />at the last meeting, noting that she has opposed Plan A since 1991 for the same safety reasons <br />she expressed at the November 19, 1997 meeting. She stated her reasons for supporting Plan <br />B, with the most significant factor relating to safety. She also presented the Commission with <br />a petition signed by 74 area residents who support Plan B and encouraged the Commission to <br />support Plan B. <br /> <br />John Severini, 433 Sycamore Road, stated that he agrees with the Greene Family that Sycamore <br />Road should not be changed in any way and that the development should be eliminated <br />altogether, along with the golf course. However, he voiced his support for Plan A because he <br />feels it is best for the community as a whole, rather than for just one family. He voiced his <br />opposition to Plan C since it shifts the road ten feet further south and he stated his opposition <br />to the traffic round. He felt that one stop sign should be installed now, and that more could be <br />added later if needed. <br /> <br />Don Temple, 6409 Alisal, noted that the entire area had a part of the original NSSP, and he <br />understood that it intended for Sycamore Road to stay in its current place, without changes. He <br />noted that increased traffic is the main concern for the residents. He also feels that if any <br />changes are made to the NSSP at this point, it will have a major impact on City government who <br />will lose the trust of the community. He expressed his opinion that the intersection be placed <br />toward the end of Sycamore Road and feels that the stop signs would correct the problems with <br /> <br />Planning Commission <br /> <br />Page 5 <br /> <br />December 10, 1997 <br />