PC 08/13/97 - Laserfiche WebLink

for the project. He noted that it has always been the intent to have all units uniformed, and that they will be spaced proportionately throughout the development. . Commissioner Cooper stated that he had talked with the applicant prior to the meeting. He expressed his concern regarding the impact on the existing residential neighbors during the construction of the project. Mr. Taggarsi advised that dust control measures would be used, as well as adherence to the approved construction hours. Commissioner Wright asked if the project would be sold off once it is constructed. Mr. Taggarsi advised that the company usually holds it projects for a long-term and that there are serious tax implications for selling before four years. In response to Commissioner Cooper's inquiry regarding security during construction, Mr. Taggarsi advised that the area will be fenced and that they will have a roving security service, especially when building materials are on the site. Commissioner Cooper advised that this situation creates an attractive nuisance for children to hang around, and that he would like to see more than a fence. Mr. Taggarsi stated that he would be happy to address this with staff. Commissioner Cooper commented on the harmful effects of ultra-fine dust and noted that he would like to see dust monitoring during the construction phase. Mr. Taggarsi stated that in addition to the standard construction practices he would work with staff to determine any additional ways of addressing this problem. Mr. Sweeney suggested that a program could be developed and adopted to monitor construction activities City-wide. He noted that since the project would not begin construction until 1998, there is time to develop such a program. . Commissioner Kumaran questioned the fiscal impact study results in light of the fee waiver. Mr. Sweeney noted that 25% of the units are reserved for affordable rents for 35 years. He noted that any applicant building this project elsewhere in Pleasanton would make this same request for the waiver of this fee. PUBLIC HEARING WAS OPENED E.J. Saucier, 5216 Genovesio Drive, stated that he supports the proposed project and the neighborhood park. He noted that the project has a lower density than the previously approved plan. He advised that if there is a way of monitoring dust and noise other than visual, he would like to hear about it. He commented that he feels that voicing concerns is the best way to have such situations addressed. Craig Taylor, 5157 Genovesio Drive, commented that he appreciates the involvement the developer has had with residents and he is in very much support of the project. Robin Taylor, 5124 Genovesio Drive, advised that he is in favor of the project and is looking forward to accelerating the schedule for the park, in that he is concerned about children playing in the streets. Angelina Summers, 4750 Sutter Gate Avenue, stated that she has always opposed homes in Hacienda Business Park. She noted that she would prefer it if Signature would purchase Lot 60 and that the housing go with the flow of the single-family homes in the area. She noted that she has concerns . Planning Commission Minutes Page 4 August 13, 1997