My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC 05/28/97
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
MINUTES
>
1990-1999
>
1997
>
PC 05/28/97
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/16/2017 3:55:45 PM
Creation date
1/26/2005 4:17:10 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
5/28/1997
DOCUMENT NAME
PC 5/28/97
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
13
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />Environmental Impact Report for the Hacienda Business Park was approved the conditions of <br />approval required the monitoring of noise, air quality, and water quality impacts. He reported that <br />the Hacienda Owners Association feels that due to the substantial development of the Business Park <br />these conditions could now be eliminated. He informed the Commission that the traffic analysis <br />previously required for each new development project had been eliminated, and that these monitoring <br />programs are similar to the traffic analysis requirement. <br /> <br />Mr. Iserson advised that a Citywide noise analysis is done every several years and that appropriate <br />safeguards are in place. He also noted that staff is recommending a condition of approval which <br />would require a site specific noise study be prepared should a use be proposed which has the <br />potential for creating an adverse noise impact. <br /> <br />Mr. Iserson reported that during the original processing of the Hacienda PUD development plans, <br />concern was expressed that future businesses, such as computer chip manufacturing, could <br />contaminate the ground water basin. However, these types of businesses generally have not located <br />in Hacienda. He advised that analysis has identified minute traces of substances, and the amounts <br />of the substances has been so low and sporadic that no additional investigation has been required by <br />any local, state, or federal agency. Staff is recommending that water quality analysis be done on a <br />site specific basis and that the abandonment of any well be done so pursuant to the requirements of <br />Zone 7. <br /> <br />With regard to the air quality monitoring requirements, Mr. Iserson noted that while traffic has <br />increased since the air quality monitoring has begun, the total amount of emissions released is <br />decreasing due to various factors. He advised that BAAQMD was contacted regarding the proposed <br />elimination of the air quality monitoring and that the District did not voice opposition, but did <br />indicate that it found the data useful to establish general area levels. Staff is recommending a <br />condition that would provide for air quality analysis and monitoring if a particular use in Hacienda <br />has the possibility of negatively impacting air quality. Alternatively, the monitoring could be <br />discontinued now but reinstated in the future if it is found that traffic assumptions are being <br />exceeded. <br /> <br />Mr. Iserson referred to the letter received today from James Paxson, General Manager of the <br />Hacienda Owners Association, which provides some additional information on the environmental <br />monitoring programs, including the costs of the monitoring programs. <br /> <br />Commissioner Cooper asked how long before the Hacienda Business Park would reach 90% buildout. <br />Mr. Paxson felt this could occur within the next couple of years. <br /> <br />Commissioner Lutz asked if 80% buildout meant that 80% of the workers and residents would be <br />in the Park. Mr. Iserson responded that the percentage of buildout refers to the square footage cap, <br />not necessarily workers. Commissioner Lutz asked if the percentage referred to built or occupied. <br />Mr. Iserson advised that the figure was based on approved and/or built. <br /> <br />In response to Commissioner Kumaran's question as to where the original intent was to continue the <br />monitoring until 100% of buildout, Mr. Iserson stated that he doesn't know if there was definite <br />thought given as to when the monitoring could be modified or discontinued. <br /> <br />Planning Commission Minutes <br /> <br />Page 7 <br /> <br />May 28, 1997 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.