My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC 05/14/97
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
MINUTES
>
1990-1999
>
1997
>
PC 05/14/97
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/16/2017 3:55:52 PM
Creation date
1/26/2005 4:14:14 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
5/14/1997
DOCUMENT NAME
PC 5/14/97
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
20
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />increase the landscaping and the retention of some trees. The design of the parking lot was <br />reviewed to lessen the impacts to the southern neighbors. <br /> <br />~ <br /> <br />The occupancy levels is another major issue as expressed by a number of neighbors and the <br />Homeowners Association. The number of parking spaces would limit the occupancy. At 2.5 guests <br />per car, the total occupancy with 59 spaces is 149 guests. Staff cannot support the 190 occupancy <br />as requested by the applicant. The overflow lot was not used in the calculations. Ten parking spaces <br />were designated for staff; therefore, 49 spaces would equal 123 guests. According to the Building <br />Code requirements pertaining to access, exiting requirements, restroom sizes, staff feels the indoor <br />maximum occupancy would have to be 120. The combined occupancy of indoor and outdoor could <br />exceed 123. So the combined indoor and outdoor occupancy would have to be restricted by the <br />parking constraints. The Golden Eagle Farm community suggested occupancy could be limited to <br />50 during the months of October through April and 125 for the months of May through September. <br />Staff has tried to reach a balance between the applicant and the development residents. Staff <br />proposes a maximum of 100 guests during the weekdays, and 120 guests be allowed on the <br />weekends. Staff does have some concern with this higher limit, but it does fall within the limits <br />received from the neighbors. Staff feels it would be prudent to establish a six-month review period. <br /> <br />The hours of operation is a major concern. The applicant originally requested the hours of 8 am to <br />11 pm. These hours were considered to be too broad by the residents. The neighbors have proposed <br />Monday-Thursday, 9 am _ 5 pm; Friday - Saturday 9 am to 9 pm and Sunday, 11 am - 7 pm, these <br />hours encompass the set-up and take-down activities. The event center would be closed on Christmas <br />Eve, Christmas Day, New Years Day, Thanksgiving and Easter. Staff feels it would be reasonable <br />to incorporate a two-tiered approach based on the kinds of activities that would occur. Indoor <br />activities with no music could potentially have longer hours of operation than outdoor activities with <br />music. Staff is proposing: <br /> <br />Indoor activities and outdoor events with no music: <br />Mon-Thurs. 9 am to 9 pm; Fri & Sat 9 am to 10 pm, and Sunday 10 am to 8 pm <br /> <br />Outdoor events and activities with music: <br />Mon-Thurs. 9 am to 8 pm; Fri & Sat 9 am to 9 pm, and Sunday 10 am to 8 pm with a <br />provision that there would be no music on Sunday after 7 pm. <br /> <br />Staff feels it would be appropriate to allow operations on Easter and Thanksgiving as long as they <br />adhere to the Sunday hours and not have any music. <br /> <br />Staff requested the applicant to provide an acoustical analysis; this has been completed. Various <br />types of music and amplification levels, and various locations around the site were analyzed. The <br />applicant proposes that soft acoustical or recorded music to be played at low levels (74 dB for music <br />played on the porch and 85 dB in the south garden area up until 9 pm). Staff is concerned with any <br />music on the front porch. It would be difficult to monitor and maintain the 74 dB on the front <br />porch. Staff proposes to restrict music to the south garden area facing in the north direction. This <br />will mitigate the impacts on the residents. Any outdoor music should be limited to acoustic and non- <br />amplified instruments. All types of indoor music played with windows and doors closed would meet <br />the noise ordinance standards. The application is conditioned that music is not to exceed 60 dB at <br />the property line and the maximum indoor playing limit would be 95 dB. <br /> <br />Planning Commission Minutes <br /> <br />Page 4 <br /> <br />May 14, 1997 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.