Laserfiche WebLink
<br />not had a consistent policy concerning City fee waivers for affordable housing projects. Since the <br />formation of the Affordable Housing Commission, they have worked toward developing a set of <br />guidelines for evaluating requests for waivers of City fees. They have looked at categorizing the <br />various types of fees charged on residential projects (the low-income housing fees, the growth impact <br />fees, building fees). Fees not impacted are "pass-through" fees--Zone 7 fees, school impact fees. <br />They also established criteria for evaluating proposals for fee waivers such as the number and ratio <br />of affordable housing units in the project, the level of affordability, the term length, project <br />amenities, quality of the project, and financial considerations. <br /> <br />These guidelines were to maintain the City's flexibility but also give some guidelines to prospective <br />developers. In staff's opinion, the guidelines don't increase the likelihood of granting fee waivers, <br />but they provide a set of criteria that can be used to evaluate all fee waiver requests on a consistent <br />basis. <br /> <br />The Housing Commission reviewed the guidelines at two meetings, and the City Council has also <br />reviewed the guidelines. They requested more information about the City's past policy and practices, <br />they wanted further discussion on the affordability standards, the income targets, implications on <br />whether or not the proposed guidelines would encourage or impede future fee waiver requests. The <br />City Council tabled the discussion to be brought up when they have their joint meeting with the <br />Affordable Housing Commission. <br /> <br />The Park and Recreation Commission has requested that they be given a referral if there is a park <br />fee waiver request. <br /> <br />Commissioner Cooper inquired if the fee waiver was for the entire fee or could it be for a partial <br />waiver. Mr. Erickson stated waivers have been done in a multitude of different ways, because there <br />has been no policy. It does not have to be an "all or nothing" situation. <br /> <br />Discussion continued regarding the reimbursement of the General Fund from the Affordable Housing <br />Fund. This is done typically when building fees are waived, although it is not specifically called out <br />to do the reimbursement. <br /> <br />Commissioner Wright agreed with the above-described criteria and procedures. <br /> <br />In response to Chair Barker, she was advised by staff that affordable housing fee per single-family <br />unit is approximately $2,000, a multi-family residence is $680 per unit, and commercial/industrial <br />has a 45 cent per square foot fee. These fees go into the Affordable Housing Fund. The fund has <br />approximately $4-5 million in it, most of which is uncommitted. Chair Barker inquired if some of <br />that uncommitted money could be used to provide more parks. Discussion continued that there must <br />be a nexus between the money's use and low-income housing. <br /> <br />Moderate income for-sale projects are defmed as 80-120% of the median income. This translates <br />to an approximately $200,000 house. <br /> <br />Commissioner Lutz inquired why the fee for the single-family house was not based on square footage <br />of the house. Mr. Beougher advised that there was no precise calculation used to settle on this <br /> <br />Planning Commission Minutes <br /> <br />Page 12 <br /> <br />Marcb 12, 1997 <br />