Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Chair Ilarker noted she did not support the application because she felt the hours should have been <br />more restrictive. <br /> <br />~ <br /> <br />Staff noted the applicant and/or neighbors may appeal this decision to the City Council within 15 <br />days. Such appeals have a notice area of 1,000 feet of the property. <br /> <br />c. PUD-85-15-7M. Golden Eal!le Farm/Currin <br />Application for a PUD major modification to allow a caretaker's residence to be established at <br />the Bernal Adobe in conjunction with a special events/conference center. The site is located at <br />1780 Foothill Road. Zoning for the property is PUD (Planned Unit Development) - LDR (Low <br />Density Residential) District. <br /> <br />Continued to April 9, 1997. <br /> <br />d. UP-96-08. Bernal Adobe SDecial Events Center <br />Application for a conditional use permit to allow the establishment of a special <br />events/conference center within the Bernal Adobe located at 1780 Foothill Road. Zoning for <br />the property is PUD (Planned Unit Development) - LDR (Low Density Residential) District. <br /> <br />Continued to April 9, 1997. <br /> <br />e. PUD-80-16-16D. CM+ CorDoration <br />Application for design review approval to allow the construction of an approximately 34,360 <br />square foot, one-story office building located at 5200 Franklin Drive. Zoning for the property <br />is PUD (Planned Unit Development) - I/C-O (Industrial/Commercial-Office) District. <br /> <br />.~ <br /> <br />Mr. Iserson presented the staff report on the application for a PUD design review approval of an <br />approximately 34,360 sq. ft. single-story building on a 2.66-acre site located in the Center Park <br />Business Park, 5200 Franklin Drive (Parcel G). The property is zoned PUD (Planned Unit <br />Development) - I/C-O (Industrial/Commercial and Office) District. <br /> <br />This is the third building proposal by CM + Corporation in the past year. Staff has reviewed the <br />development proposal with respect to the PUD development standards and found it to be in <br />compliance. Mr. Iserson noted that the staff report states there are too many compact parking <br />spaces. This is incorrect. The applicant is providing more parking than is required by Code, and <br />the extra parking is all compact spaces. This is acceptable. Staff requested the Commission delete <br />Condition 10. <br /> <br />A traffic study has been completed by the applicant for this site that looked at both local streets and <br />the freeway. With the proposed project, existing projects, and approved projects, traffic levels <br />would be met at the various intersections and interchanges. This assumes the upcoming <br />improvements to the Hopyard/Owens intersection which will be completed this year. <br /> <br />The traffic levels have also been looked at with respect to the General Plan model. It was found that <br />project traffic will be less than assumed by the General Plan. The applicant will also be required <br />to participate in the traffic mitigation measures determined by the West Las Positas Traffic Study. <br /> <br />Page 10 <br /> <br />March 12, 1997 <br /> <br />Planning Commission Minutes <br />