Laserfiche WebLink
<br />for Institutional; not everyone loves more residential. Churches and day care facilities have high <br />impacts. It is hard to think of any institutional use that would not have the same amount of impacts. <br />His biggest concern is the traffic. He sees no reason why the parents can't make a V-turn and have <br />a looped-type parking lot thereby not impacting the Stone Pointe Way residents. Commissioner <br />Cooper feels ELI has made a substantial attempt to mitigate their impact. It was very reasonable to <br />curtail all operations at 6 p.m. Public schools don't have such restrictions on their activities. It is <br />regrettable that some people find the noise of children playing disturbing. Commissioner Cooper will <br />support the application with a modification of the traffic flow in the parking lot. <br /> <br />~ <br /> <br />Commissioner Dove has talked to the traffic staff and they feel the recommended traffic flow is the <br />best of all options. He would recommend for the proposed traffic flow. <br /> <br />Commissioner Wright also concurred with the traffic flow as proposed by staff. <br /> <br />Commissioner Wright motioned, seconded by Commissioner Lutz, making the finding that the <br />proposed project would not have a significant impact on the environment and adopt the draft <br />resolution recommending approval of Exhibit "C," the draft Initial Study and Negative <br />Declaration. <br /> <br />ROLL CALL VOTE <br /> <br />AYES: <br />NOES: <br />ABSENT: <br />ABSTAIN: <br /> <br />Commissioners Cooper, Lutz, Wright and Vice Chair Dove <br />None <br />Chair Barker <br />None <br /> <br />Resolution No. PC 97-20 was entered recommending approval of Exhibit C, the draft Initial <br />Study and Negative Declaration, as motioned. <br /> <br />Commissioner Wright motioned, seconded by Commissioner Lutz, making the PUD <br />Development Plan findings for the proposed project and recommending approval of PUD-96-19 <br />to the City Council, subject to the conditions of approval listed in Exhibit B, incorporating the <br />conditions as stated in the staff memorandum dated February 26, 1997. <br /> <br />ROLL CALL VOTE <br /> <br />AYES: <br />NOES: <br />ABSENT: <br />ABSTAIN: <br /> <br />Commissioners Lutz, Wright and Vice Chair Dove <br />Commissioner Cooper <br />Chair Barker <br />None <br /> <br />Resolution No. PC 97-21 was entered recommending approval of Case PUD-96-19 to the City <br />Council, as motioned. <br /> <br />Page 9 <br /> <br />February 26, 1997 <br /> <br />Planning Commission Minutes <br />