PC 02/26/97 - Laserfiche WebLink

Terry Kamp addressed some raised issues. Ingress and egress from Stoneridge remains an issue. If both ingress and egress were on Stoneridge, it would require a lengthy deceleration lane from the east in front of the Zone 7 pump station and a need for an acceleration lane on the balance of the block. This could cause an incredible safety hazard for motorists. He acknowledged that Stone Pointe Way is narrow, but he feels the median will slow down the residential traffic turning into the neighborhood. Commissioner Cooper inquired if the entrance could be at the south corner on Stone Pointe Way. Mr. Kamp feels there would not be enough stacking area. To Commissioner Cooper's suggestion of putting both the ingress and egress on Stoneridge Drive, Mr. Kamp feels it is physically possible to do, but it would still necessitate the need of the deceleration and acceleration lanes. The right-of- way in that situation could be confusing to motorists. PUBLIC HEARING WAS CLOSED Commissioner Dove advised that he had spoken with Dr. Bernstein. In response to Commissioner Wright, Mr. Higdon advised that the median on Stone Pointe Way would be about four feet wide, six inch curbs, large cobblestones, and a reflector sign. Commissioner Lutz inquired if Mr. Cannon was asked to review the revised architectural plans. Mr. Iserson stated that it was not referred to Mr. Cannon because from the very beginning it was felt that the design was very well done. Commissioner Wright clarified with staff that their desire is to work with the architect to add some decorative features to the project, but at a modest scale. Commissioner Wright agreed with the applicant that the chain link fence will not be as obtrusive as some have expressed. The wood slat fence has proven not to withstand a lot of abuse; he would agree to the use of black clad fencing throughout the project. As far as the waiver of school impact fees, the applicants will need to negotiate that with the School District. A lot of the letters referred to the size of the student population. ELI has cut the maximum in half; Commissioner Wright feels this puts them in compliance with all State requirements. Commissioner Wright noted there is concern of cut-through traffic onto the extension of Stoneridge, though not enough to invalidate the traffic report. Regarding the noise of the children, originally the building was along the fence line to act as a sound buffer, however, those residents said they didn't want the building adjacent to their property. Commissioner Wright can support the application and feels it is a good use for the parcel. Other uses could be a church and day care which could have seven-days-a-week usage. Commissioner Lutz feels it is an appropriate use for the site and complies with the zoning of the General Plan. It has been scaled to 200 students which meets the objections raised in the first meeting. The parking and drop off lane have been increased significantly. The land was zoned for this type of use and staff has imposed quite restrictive conditions. We can't control what a realtor will say to make a sale. Commissioner Lutz supports the project as it is presented. Commissioner Cooper advised he had spent a considerable time walking the site. It is a tough site to deal with, but he feels it would have problems no matter what would be proposed. It is zoned Planning Commission Minutes Page 8 February 26, 1997