Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Commissioner Wright inquired what product mix of elevations would be acceptable to Presley <br />Homes. Mr. Flynn suggested that, instead of having a rigid percentage, have a direction as a <br />starting point and possibly have an opportunity to review the mix and success of the project where <br />they can get staff's opinion on how they are providing the mix. Perhaps in the second phase the <br />percentages could be 33% of Plan I, 40% Plan 3, and the balance in Plan 2. <br /> <br />Ms. Harper-Chan requested that perhaps staff could modify the condition by adding SOfie flexible <br />language; Presley Homes understands staff's intent for product mix. <br /> <br />In response to Commissioner Lutz, Mr. Flynn advised that their marketing personnel has found that <br />in this price range of homes, people are more interested in moving from a wood-siding house to a <br />stucco finish house. He also noted that the stucco [mish they use is a highly-skilled finish <br />application. It is equal in cost to the wood-siding. <br /> <br />PUBLIC HEARING WAS CLOSED <br /> <br />Mr. Iserson stated that Condition 8 should be modified to add some flexible language--the "goal <br />should be around 30% and the applicant will work with staff to try and achieve this goal." <br /> <br />Commissioner Lutz commends staff disallowing the four-car front entry garages. <br /> <br />The Commissioners agreed that they are comfortable with the au pair units because the units are <br />certain to be compatible architecturally to the main house unit. <br /> <br />Commissioner Wright motioned, seconded by Commissioner Cooper, making the findings for <br />the proposed conditional use as listed in the staff report and approving Case UP-96-086 subject <br />to the conditions listed in Exhibit "B-l," <br /> <br />ROLL CALL VOTE <br /> <br />AYES: <br />NOES: <br />ABSENT: <br />ABSTAIN: <br /> <br />Commissioners Cooper, Lutz, Wright and Vice Chair Dove <br />None <br />Chair Barker <br />None <br /> <br />Commissioner Wright motioned, seconded by Commissioner Cooper, approving Case Z-96-257 <br />subject to the conditions listed in Exhibit "B-2," with the following modification: <br /> <br />Condition 8A: <br /> <br />Revise the text such that "the goal should be around 30%/25% and the <br />applicant will work with staff to try and achieve this goal." <br /> <br />ROLL CALL VOTE <br /> <br />AYES: <br />NOES: <br />ABSENT: <br />ABSTAIN: <br /> <br />Commissioners Cooper, Lutz, Wright, and Vice Chair Dove <br />None <br />Chair Barker <br />None <br /> <br />Page 15 <br /> <br />.'ebruary 26, 1997 <br /> <br />Planning Commission Minutes <br />