My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC 01/22/97
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
MINUTES
>
1990-1999
>
1997
>
PC 01/22/97
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/16/2017 3:56:32 PM
Creation date
1/26/2005 3:51:59 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
1/22/1997
DOCUMENT NAME
PC 1/22/97
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
23
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />At buildout, there will be 400 students at this site, there are a total of 600 children at the Mohr <br />Avenue school and the St. Elizabeth Seton church has a long-term plan of having a private school. <br /> <br />There is concern that the parents driving to this school will use the lighted intersection of Garden <br />Creek Circle and Stoneridge Drive and drive through the surrounding neighborhood to reach the <br />school. <br /> <br />Further neighborhood concerns are: it is unrealistic that there would be only two night-time meetings <br />per month; there is an insufficient buffer between the Phase II building and the houses; the parking <br />lot is very small and will lead to parents parking in the surrounding neighborhood streets. Comment <br />was made that the City should purchase the land for a park. Also, this proposal would adversely <br />affect property values. <br /> <br />The Stoneridge Drive Specific Plan zones this for Public/Institutional. A private school is consistent <br />with the zoning, but the question is whether a 400 student school is appropriate for this property. <br />This would be determined by the traffic, number of trips, how the parents would drive through the <br />neighborhood, access off Stone Pointe Way, adequate parking, and the location of the Phase II <br />building. <br /> <br />Staff feels there is some problem with the size of the school from a traffic standpoint. The traffic <br />report states this would be a LOS A situation for the intersection and traffic through the <br />neighborhood would be negligible. Staff does not conclude with these findings. With the buildout <br />of the area and the long-term traffic on Stoneridge Drive, staff feels some parents will cut through <br />on Garden Creek Circle. Parking at buildout is inadequate, and there is a high likelihood of night- <br />- time usage more than twice per month. The neighbors backing to the Phase II school building would <br />like the building repositioned. Staff talked at length with these people advising them that they would <br />then be subjected to the athletic field and noise. The residents stated they could live with that <br />situation. <br /> <br />It is staff's recommendation for the Commission to take public testimony, discuss the project and <br />provide direction to staff, and continue the matter to another hearing date. <br /> <br />Commissioner Dove inquired if this application is approving only the first building or the entire <br />project. Mr. Pavan stated that it is for the entire project at 400 students. The Commission could <br />reduce the scope of the project and the number of students. <br /> <br />Chair Barker inquired if the project complies with the school acreage numbers. Mr. Pavan stated <br />it does not, but private schools are not required to meet the state required acreage figures. <br /> <br />PUBLIC HEARING WAS OPENED <br /> <br />Charles Bernstein, 445 East Charleston Road, Palo Alto, focused on the issues of importance due <br />to the lateness of the hour. Representatives were available to answer any questions about the project <br />and the school's academic program. <br /> <br />The problems are traffic, circulation, parking, safety, and noise. EU are also concerned with these <br />- problems and are interested in solutions, but they believe it is appropriate to have an elementary <br /> <br />Planning Commission Mmutes <br /> <br />Page 17 <br /> <br />January 22, 1997 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.