SR 05:027 - Laserfiche WebLink

Accordingly, staff suggests that the following process be followed: January 11, 2005 Joint Workshop: · Staff presentation of the Part I network options/alternatives model runs - by options/alternatives · Planning Commission/City Council questions concerning model assumptions and results - after each option/alternative · Public questions concerning model assumption and results - at conclusion of all options/alternatives January 25, 2005 Joint Workshop Continuation ofstaffpresentation as necessary · Staff presentation of the Part II network options/alternatives model runs · Public questions concerning model assumption and results - at conclusion of all options/alternatives #3 Future Joint Workshop · Continuation ofstaffpresentation as necessary · Staff presentation of land use alternative model runs - by options/alternatives · City Council and Planning Commission questions concerning model assumptions and results - after each options/alternatives · Public questions concerning model assumption and results - at conclusion of all options/alternatives #4 Future Joint Workshop · Continuation of staff presentation as necessary · Presentation of policy options/alternatives model runs - by options/alternatives · City Council and Planning Commission questions concerning model assumptions and results - after each options/alternatives · Public questions concerning model assumption and results - at conclusion of all options/alternatives #5 Future Joint Workshop · Staff presentation of"combined" land use, network, and policy scenarios' model runs - with range of options as outlined in Spring 2004 reports · City Council and Planning Commission questions concerning assumptions/results - after each scenario · Public questions concerning scenarios - at conclusion of all scenarios · City Council and Planning Commission suggest combined alternatives/options to be studied (in addition to those already identified) SR 05:027 Page 4