My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
SR 05:005
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2005
>
SR 05:005
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/29/2004 8:47:31 AM
Creation date
12/22/2004 2:57:14 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
STAFF REPORTS
DOCUMENT DATE
1/4/2005
DESTRUCT DATE
15 Y
DOCUMENT NO
SR 05:005
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
30
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
DRAFT <br /> <br />PDR-414~ James Ervin <br />Application for design review approval to construct an approximately 768-square-foot <br />addition, to be used as retail space, in front of the existing single-family home located at <br />4473 Railroad Avenue. Three parking spaces would be added at the rear of the property. <br />Zoning for the property is C-C (Central Commercial) and Downtown Revitalization <br />District. <br /> <br />Mr. Pavan summarized the staff report and described the history and scope of the project. <br />According to the City's records, this building has not been designated historically significant. <br />He noted that there was a slight difference between the floor area stated in the staff report and <br />what is shown on the floor plan (804 square feet); staff believes the floor plan square footage <br />includes the bay windows. The new retail addition would match the existing building design as <br />to materials and detailing; the colors would be changed, and a memo detailing those changes was <br />distributed to the Commission. He stated that the proposal conformed to the Downtown Specific <br />Plan and the General Plan. The existing home would be retained, and retail floor area would be <br />added to create a live/work use. The proposed application also facilitates the expansion of retail <br />uses in the side streets of the Downtown area and conformed to the Downtown Design <br />Guidelines. Staff believes the addition is architecturally compatible with the additional structure <br />and retains the integrity of the existing building elements. Existing trees would be maintained, <br />sufficient parking would be available, and a disabled entrance would be provided. <br /> <br />Staff believes the proposal meets the intent of the codes and added that after review, the <br />Pleasanton Downtown Association (PDA) indicated its acceptance and approval of the proposal. <br />Staff became aware of concern by the Chair of the PDA Design Committee (Michael <br />O'Callahan) with respect to the appearance of the front faqade, specifically making it more retail <br />compatible in appearance. He noted that the recently adopted Downtown Design Guidelines <br />called for retail storefronts to have clear, unobstructed glass; muttons, mullions, and divided <br />lights were discouraged. Staffrecommended an additional condition of approval calling for the <br />muttons and mullions to be removed from the faqade; the applicant has agreed to that condition. <br />Staff believes this project meets the intent of the design guidelines and that it would introduce an <br />attractive retail component in the Downtown district. Staff recommended approval of this <br />application. <br /> <br />In response to an inquiry by Chairperson Roberts regarding the building's use, Mr. Pavan <br />confirmed that the rest of the building would remain a residence. The applicant will live in that <br />house. <br /> <br />In response to an inquiry by Commissioner Blank regarding the use of the retail cigar store, <br />Ms. Nerland replied that under State law, consumption of cigars on the premises for testing <br />purposes was allowed. She added that this use in retail spaces with common walls was a touchy <br />subject. The applicant must comply with State law with respect to selling tobacco products to <br />minors. <br /> <br />THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS OPENED. <br /> <br />There were no speakers. <br /> <br />DRAFT EXCERPTS: PLANN1NG COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES, October 27, 2004Page 1 of 2 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.