Laserfiche WebLink
DRAFT <br /> <br />THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS CLOSED. <br /> <br />The Commission had no objection to the applicant's placement of the mullions if he so desired. <br /> <br />Commissioner Sullivan expressed concern about the concept of covering up a 104-year-old <br />building. He preferred having a Downtown with real historic buildings. He noted that he would <br />not support this application. <br /> <br />Commissioner Fox agreed with Commissioner Sullivan's comments and cited the Bonde house <br />in Dublin as an example of retaining the original facade. She did not feel comfortable modifying <br />the front and could not support this application. <br /> <br />Chairperson Roberts emphasized that this was a retail use in the Downtown and believed that the <br />addition would not destroy the original building, making it look as much like the original as <br />possible. She believed retaining the mullions would be acceptable and believed that would give <br />the building more historical perspective. <br /> <br />Commissioner Arkin expressed concern about this project and did not believe the change would <br />be beneficial. <br /> <br />Commissioner Maas moved to approve PDR-414 as conditioned in the staff report. The <br />question of the placement of window grids would be determined to the satisfaction of the <br />Planning Director prior to the issuance of the building permit. <br />Commissioner Roberts seconded the motion. <br /> <br />ROLL CALL VOTE: <br /> <br />AYES: <br />NOES: <br />ABSTAiN: <br />RECUSED: <br />ABSENT: <br /> <br />Commissioners Maas and Roberts. <br />Commissioners Arkin, Fox, and Sullivan. <br />None. <br />None. <br />None. <br /> <br />The motion did not carry. <br /> <br />Resolution No. PC-2004-66 was entered and adopted, denying the application. <br /> <br />DRAFT EXCERPTS: PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES, October 27, 2004Page 2 of 2 <br /> <br /> <br />