Laserfiche WebLink
Resolution No. 04-096 <br />Page 4 <br /> <br />Ce <br /> <br />Cancellation is for an alternative use, which is consistent with the <br />applicable provisions of the City' s General Plan. The alternative use as <br />depicted in the approved PUD plan and Tentative Map are consistent with <br />the Vineyard Avenue Corridor Specific Plan and the City's General Plan. In <br />the Resolution Approving Vesting Tentative Map 7385 the City specifically <br />found that the proposed development was consistent with the intent and <br />requirements of the General Plan and Specific Plan, and that it substantially <br />conformed to the zoning regulations/development plan for the area <br /> <br />Cancellation will not result in discontinuous patterns of urban development. <br />Cancellation will allow the development of the property which <br />development has been approved as being consistent with the General Plan <br />and the Specific Plan that was adopted by the City Council for the purpose <br />of providing continuity in the pattern of the development of the Vineyard <br />Avenue Corridor. The Specific Plan and subsequent approval of the PUD <br />Plan and Tentative Map and related Development Agreement are the <br />essential tools in making the development of this portion of Pleasanton <br />continuous and consistent with the City's General Plan. <br /> <br />Eo <br /> <br />There is no proximate noncontracted land which is both available and <br />suitable for the use to which it is proposed the contracted land be put, or, <br />that development of the contracted land would provide more contiguous <br />patterns of urban development than development of proximate <br />noncontracted land. The development of the contracted land would provide <br />more contiguous patterns of urban development than development of <br />proximate noncontracted land as the subject land is within the Vineyard <br />Avenue Corridor Specific Plan area and designated and zoned for <br />development consistent therewith. <br /> <br />16. <br /> <br />Cancellation of the Williamson Act for the RMC property is in the public interest <br />based on each of the following findings: <br /> <br />Ao <br /> <br />That other public concerns substantially outweigh the objectives of the <br />Williamson Act. <br /> <br />The relevant objectives of the Williamson Act are, in summary, as <br />follows: (a) preservation of limited agricultural land to maintain the <br />agricultural economy of the state and adequate food for the future; <br />(b) discouragement of premature and unnecessary conversion of <br />agricultural land to urban uses benefits urban dwellers as it <br />discourages discontinuous patterns of development which increase <br />costs of community services; and (c) agricultural lands have value as <br />open space constituting an important physical, social, esthetics, and <br />economic asset to existing and pending urban developments. <br /> <br /> <br />