MARK THOMAS & COMPANY, INC. (2) - Laserfiche WebLink

5 Mark Thomas shall task a field crew to survey the location of potholed utilities and provide the horizontal and vertical location of the reference points set by others (potholer). This data will be updated in the utility base map and provided to the engineering team to facilitate design. This scope of work is limited to three (3) days of field work. It is assumed that field crews will mobilize after all potholes have been completed. TASK 2 DELIVERABLE(S): • Supplemental Survey and Pothole Location Survey – AutoCAD Format • Optional: Boundary Mapping (20 Scale) – AutoCAD Format • Optional Task Item: - TCE Exhibits (Up to 48) • Composite Utility Relocation Plan • Utility “B & C Letters” • Pothole Work Plan • Allowance: Utility Pothole Reports (Up to 45) • All deliverables to be submitted electronically in .pdf format unless specified otherwise Task 4. ENVIRONMENTAL CLEARANCE As a subconsultant to Mark Thomas, Circlepoint will manage the environmental review effort and maintain close contact with City staff and the engineering team throughout the project design phase and the environmental review process. The following scope of work reflects this level of effort. Task 4.1. CEQA Addendum Project improvements are referenced in the 2021-2022 Capital Improvement Plan, the 2018 Bike and Pedestrian Master Plan, and the West Las Positas Boulevard Bikeway Feasibility Study. Circlepoint has conducted a preliminary review of the City of Pleasanton planning documents, and we anticipate preparation of a focused addendum to the 2009 Bike and Pedestrian Master Plan IS/MND would be the appropriate approach to clear the project under CEQA, assuming the City has retained complete records of this CEQA document. If the City has prepared a more recent CEQA document to support the 2018 Bike and Pedestrian Master Plan, we will tier from that document in lieu of the 2009 IS/MND. The focused addendum would be structured as a memorandum focusing on key environmental topics, including biological and water resources, cultural resources, and construction-period air quality and noise. To the extent feasible, Circlepoint would leverage previous analysis conducted and would develop a streamlined environmental document to allow for a more cost effective and efficient environmental review process. Circlepoint will review prior technical analyses and CEQA documentation completed by the City to confirm the project would not result in any new or more significant impacts under CEQA. To support this anticipated conclusion as well as to support NEPA clearance, supplemental technical reports will be prepared as described below and under Task 4.2. CEQA-specific technical memos: • Air Quality/GHG: Circlepoint will retain a qualified technical specialist to prepare a memorandum comparing the project with the 2009 IS/MND, to demonstrate whether the project would result in new or greater impacts. • Cultural Resources: Circlepoint will utilize a qualified technical specialist to prepare a memorandum evaluating whether the 2009 IS/MND fully captured potential project impacts to historic and archeological resources. The memorandum will address building/potential historic resources that now meet the minimum age for NRHP evaluation (but did not meet that criteria in 2009). Because the project is entirely within the ROW and the project type is consistent with existing conditions (transportation facility), no new impacts are anticipated. Docusign Envelope ID: CFB4D269-E371-4DA6-B769-59DDBD4C7856Docusign Envelope ID: B363250F-E21F-4652-B170-E77C9043D4FB