My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
AGENDA FULL PACKET
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2020 - PRESENT
>
2024
>
05-22
>
AGENDA FULL PACKET
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/20/2024 4:35:24 PM
Creation date
5/20/2024 4:34:27 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
5/22/2024
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
86
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
P24-0278, 2207 Martin Ave. Planning Commission <br />7 of 8 <br />With respect to the surrounding neighborhood, per satellite imagery, there are currently six <br />properties in the vicinity of the subject parcel that have an existing sports court (see Table 2 <br />and Figure 4). Staff was not able to determine if any of the six sports courts include sport court <br />lighting. Of the six properties, two (properties, 1 and 2, per Table 3) contained an existing <br />tennis court prior to annexation into the City. In addition, City records do not show that the City <br />issued planning or building permits for any sports court for any of the six properties. However, <br />as noted above, not all sports court improvements may require City permitting – e.g. a sports <br />court consisting only of flat work (concrete slab) and striping would not require City permits. <br /> <br />Table 2: Addresses of Numbered Properties with Sport Courts <br />1 3711 Trenery Drive <br />2 3710 Trenery Drive <br />3 2556 Wilde Avenue <br />4 2564 Wilde Avenue <br />5 3614 Diablo Court <br />6 3623 Cameron Avenue <br /> <br />Figure 5: Properties with Sport Courts <br /> <br />PROJECT SITE ALTERNATIVES <br />As outlined above, staff believes the project, as proposed and conditioned, would be <br />compatible with the surrounding parcels in the neighborhood and not create adverse impacts <br />and recommends the Planning Commission approve the project. However, alternatives to the <br />proposal that could be considered by the Planning Commission include:
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.