My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
CALIFORNIA GOLD ADVOCACY GROUP
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
CONTRACTS
>
C
>
CALIFORNIA GOLD ADVOCACY GROUP
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/16/2024 10:49:39 AM
Creation date
2/16/2024 10:49:35 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CONTRACTS
Description Type
Other
Contract Type
New
NAME
CALIFORNIA GOLD ADVOCACY GROUP
Contract Record Series
704-05
Contract Expiration
10/31/2024
NOTES
REIMBURSEMENT AGREEMENT ONLY, FOR WORK VIA APPROVED CITY ON-CALL AUTHORIZATION
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
11
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
City of Pleasanton <br />Proposal to Prepare a CEQA Guidelines Section 15182 Consistency Analysis <br />for the 4212 and 4226 First Street Residential Project <br />4 <br />required. Upon completion of the survey and analysis of results, Rincon will prepare a cultural <br />resources letter report discussing the results of the records search, Native American scoping, and <br />field survey. The DPR forms will be attached to the letter report and filed with the NWIC. The results <br />of this assessment will be used to inform the CEQA analysis. Rincon understands that the City is <br />proposing a general plan amendment for land use for this project. Under Senate Bill (SB) 18 <br />(California Code Section 65352.3 and 65352.4), the CEQA lead agency is required to begin <br />consultation with California Native American Tribes that are traditionally and culturally affiliated with <br />the project site prior to the release of a negative declaration, mitigated negative declaration, or <br />environmental impact report. Rincon will request an SB 18 consultation list from the NAHC and will <br />assist the City of Pleasanton with consultation under SB 18 by providing letter templates, checklists, <br />and detailed instructions to help ensure meaningful consultation with interested Native American <br />groups. NAHC requests are typically fulfilled in 4-8 weeks. This task does not include meetings, <br />outreach, consultation or mailing letters to Tribal governments. Rincon assumes the City of <br />Pleasanton will officially contact all applicable Tribes. <br />Hazards and Hazardous Materials. Rincon will address potential risk of upset based on construction <br />and operation of the proposed project. The analysis will include a review of client-provided <br />documents (Phase I Environmental Site Assessment [ESA], Corrective Action Plan, and ACDEH <br />Letter) and a review of regulatory records that are readily available from online database such as, <br />but not limited to, Department of Toxic Substances Control (EnviroStor website), and State Water <br />Resources Control Board (GeoTracker website) concerning past contaminant spills and/or cleanup <br />activities within the proposed project area and adjacent properties. <br />Preliminary review of the client-provided documents indicates that the Phase I ESA identified a <br />closed leaking underground storage tank (LUST) case; current USTs, piping, and hoists; and deed <br />restrictions associated with the subject property. Additionally, there are two other closed LUST cases <br />nearby. The proximity of educational facilities and airports will also be researched for potential <br />impacts. This proposal assumes that potential hazardous materials impacts would be sufficiently <br />addressed with adherence to existing policies, regulations and ongoing processes. <br />Transportation. Rincon assumes that the either 1) the project’s impacts can be determined to be <br />within the transportation impacts assumed for the site as analyzed in the DSP EIR, or 2) the project <br />will meet screening criteria that support a determination that vehicle miles traveled (VMT) impacts <br />would be less than significant – e.g., the project would generate fewer than 110 trips per day and <br />would be consistent with the General Plan (as amended by the proposed project). Alternatively, a <br />transportation impact study may be added to our scope of work at an additional cost. <br />The Draft Consistency Analysis will be in the format of a stand-alone report. Rincon will submit an <br />electronic copy in Microsoft Word and PDF formats for City review and comment. We have scoped for <br />two rounds of City review and have assumed that no major revisions or new analysis will be required. <br />Task 3: Final CEQA Guidelines Section 15182 Consistency Analysis <br />Rincon will address City comments on the Draft Consistency Analysis and prepare the Final Consistency <br />Analysis. We assume that, consistent with the CEQA Guidelines, the document will not be specifically <br />and separately circulated for public comment. If the City does circulate the document for public <br />comment, Rincon can prepare responses or assist the City with responses. If the number or complexity <br />DocuSign Envelope ID: FF612D3A-D9AB-47B7-BC6D-B4068941C343DocuSign Envelope ID: 365E70E7-A0EC-491F-9D81-6B86F626F7CE
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.