Laserfiche WebLink
<br />2 <br /> <br />Proposal <br />The project applicant is applying for a density bonus. State law and the Pleasanton Municipal Code <br />mandate a density bonus above the maximum density that is otherwise allowed for senior housing <br />projects. Pursuant to Government Code section 65915(f)(3), “the density bonus shall be 20 percent of <br />the number of senior housing units.” Similarly, Pleasanton Municipal Code sections 17.38.030.C and <br />17.38.040.B provide for a 20 percent bonus above the maximum allowable density of the property. As <br />noted in the City’s Housing Element, the maximum allowable density of the project site is 93 units. <br />(Housing Element, p. B-46). All of the project units will be restricted to senior housing, which entitles the <br />applicant to a 20 percent bonus. The bonus yields an additional 18.4 units, which is rounded up to 19. <br />This yields a total of 112 units. The project proposes 110 new homes and retention of one existing home, <br />for a total of 111 homes on the site. <br />FCS understands that the applicant is seeking approval of the project’s development plan, including <br />prezoning the site to PUD; the vesting tentative and final maps; affordable housing agreement; <br />development agreement; review of tree removal pursuant to Municipal Code Section 17.16.050; <br />demolition, grading and building permits, certificates of occupancy, and encroachment permits; and <br />annexation to the City. <br />SCOPE OF WORK <br />Approach <br />The project is consistent with the development density established by General Plan policies for the site <br />(which include the recent Housing Element Update). FCS has reviewed the 2023-2031 (6th Cycle) Housing <br />Element Update Program Environmental Impact Report (State Clearinghouse No. 2022040091), herein <br />referred to as the Housing Element Update FEIR, and the site plan, and it appears that an Initial Study <br />with a Consistency Checklist would satisfy CEQA Guidelines Section 15183 and provide the appropriate <br />level of CEQA documentation for an exemption. This conclusion is based on the following factors: (1) the <br />project is consistent with the development density and the existing General Plan land use designations <br />(last amended by General Plan Amendment Resolution No. 23-1406 on June 20, 2023); (2) the project <br />consists of residential uses and, thus, would be compatible with surrounding land uses; (3) and the <br />project would be developed on an infill site. <br />Drawing on the Housing Element Update FEIR to streamline environmental review, FCS will prepare an <br />Initial Study that references the previous analysis and uniformly applied mitigation measures to <br />evaluate if there are project specific significant impacts that are peculiar to the project or the site. The <br />Consistency Checklist would determine whether the proposed project falls within the buildout <br />parameters evaluated within the Housing Element Update FEIR and would also determine whether there <br />would be any new or substantially greater impacts that what was previously disclosed. <br />FCS will also provide documentation that the proposed project would not require supplemental <br />environmental review pursuant to Section 15162. This supplemental analysis will be provided in the <br />IS/Consistency Checklist. Based on preliminary review of available project information, FCS anticipates <br />that a Consistency Checklist will be the appropriate level of CEQA review. If, in our analysis, FCS <br />DocuSign Envelope ID: 8E6A239C-EFA8-4B71-9925-FD59383F7852DocuSign Envelope ID: 3BEEDA86-3A65-4060-BFF8-BD1CAC784FCC