My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
06
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2023
>
091923 SPECIAL
>
06
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/13/2023 2:14:27 PM
Creation date
9/13/2023 2:11:14 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
9/19/2023
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
75
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
RECEIVED <br /> 06.17.23 <br /> PUD-148 <br /> Description of Proposal: <br /> CITY OF PLEASANTON <br /> We propose to build a 10 ft high sports court fencing for the tennis court that has been built inF'6dfNNING DIVISION <br /> backyard. EXHIBIT B <br /> Background:We,the current owners, purchased this property in April 2022 and have been using this <br /> property as our primary residence since then. In August 2022, we reached out to Pleasanton City to seek <br /> approval for building a tennis court along with a 10ft high sports court fencing and 12ft high LED lights in <br /> our back yard.The city gave us the go ahead for the Tennis Court with sport court fencing however we <br /> were asked to submit an application for administrative design review to secure planning permit for the <br /> lights. <br /> Subsequently we undertook the construction of the proposed Tennis Court and the sports court fencing <br /> (without LED lights). We also applied for planning permit for LED lights. By early December 2022, the flat <br /> work for the tennis court was fully completed and we put in the poles for the sport court fencing(The <br /> chain link had not been put in yet). <br /> On or around December 10th 2022, we received a call from City Enforcement that our neighbour had <br /> complained about the tennis court and we were directed to contact the city. On further discussions with <br /> the city,we have been directed to submit this application. <br /> We had built the sports court based on following two email communications from Planner on Duty <br /> Email dated November 9th, 2022 by Planner on Duty:<Quote Begin> "The property is zoned PUD-LDR <br /> and subject to the R-1-20,000 development standards. Per the R-1-20,000 standards, accessory <br /> structures are required to be setback 5-feet from the rear setback line and 3-feet from the side property <br /> line (see Table 18.84.010)." <Quote End> <br /> Email dated August 22nd,2022 by Planner on Duty:<Quote Begin> "The tennis court would not require <br /> any Planning review or permits.The same for the 10-foot-high fence from a Planning perspective, but <br /> again it cannot exceed 10 feet at any point.A Building permit would be required for the fence." <Quote <br /> End> <br /> Proposal:We are proposing to go with the development standards of an established zone (R-1-40,000) <br /> with specific sport courts fencing standards. <br /> The sports court fencing will have maximum height of 10 ft with other standards as follows: <br /> • Minimum Side Setback of 6 ft from side boundary of the property. <br /> • Minimum Rear Setback of 10 ft from rear boundary of the property. <br /> • Maximum sport court fence height of 10 ft <br /> • Sports court will be in the backyard and will not be in the front yard of the house. <br /> • The fencing screen will be chain link fence <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.