Laserfiche WebLink
PUD-148, 2207 Martin Ave. Planning Commission <br />9 of 14 <br />Table 1: Development Standards <br /> <br /> <br />R-1-40,000 <br />Zoning <br />District3 <br />2207 Martin <br />Ave. (Ex. <br />House)4 <br />Minimum Lot Size <br />Area 40,000 sq.ft. 72,647 sq.ft. <br />Width 150 ft. 181.58 ft. <br />Depth 150 ft. 399.92 ft. <br />Primary Structure <br />Front setback 30’ min. 130’-4” <br />Side/both setback 5’/50’ min. 46’-10”/77’-5” <br />Rear setback 30’ min. 216’-2” <br />Height 30’ max. 24’ <br />Floor area ratio (FAR)5 25% max. 6.35% <br />Parking 2 Spaces 3 Spaces <br />Class 1 Accessory <br />Structures (PMC <br />18.84.160) <br /> <br />Front setback Not Allowed N/A <br />Side Setback 20’ min. N/A <br />Rear Setback 20’ min.. N/A <br />Height 15’ max. N/A <br /> <br />As shown in City records, the existing single-family residence conforms to the recommended <br />development standards; however, there are existing accessory structures (enclosed structure <br />and trellis patios) which do not conform to the side yard setback requirements. Those <br />accessory structures are considered legal non-conforming. Any additional development on the <br />subject parcel would be required to adhere to the development standards established with the <br />PUD development plan herein. <br /> <br />The PMC does not address guest parking within single-family developments, but the City <br />encourages, and often requires, on-site guest parking for single-family projects when there is <br />no on-street parking provided within the project, as is the case here. The existing single-family <br />residence contains an attached three-car garage and includes a generous driveway apron in <br />front of the garage, approximately 33 feet in width which can accommodate an additional two <br />cars, to be used by the residents or guests of the residence. Overall, staff finds the proposed <br />development standards (except for proposed sports court development standards) for the <br />existing single-family residence and accessory structures would complement and be consistent <br />with the surrounding residential neighborhood. <br /> <br />Sports Court Development Standards <br />In addition to the proposed R-1-40,000 District development standards, the applicant is <br />proposing site-specific development standards for sports court fencing (as shown in Table 2 <br />below and described in Exhibit B attached). The PMC does not address sports courts and <br />associated fencing. However, fencing (generally) in the R-1-40,000 District is regulated by <br /> <br />3 At least one space per dwelling unit of the off -street parking required shall be located in a garage or carport per PMC. <br />4 Date from City Records <br />5 Not including garage floor area.