2_Exhibit B - Laserfiche WebLink

PUD-114-01M, 11300 Dublin Canyon Road Planning Commission 3 of 15 development plan would be subject to the permitted and conditional uses of the Agriculture District as defined in the Pleasanton Municipal Code. Churches, convents, monasteries, parish houses, parsonages, and other religious institutions are conditionally permitted uses in both the One-Family Residential and Agriculture Districts. April 14, 2021, Planning Commission Work Session The project was reviewed and discussed at a work session with the Planning Commission held on April 14, 2021. Listed below are the topics discussed at the work session (the minutes from the work session regarding this item are attached to this report as Exhibit C), along with a brief summary of the discussion. 1. Is the site appropriate for a church development? Commissioners unanimously supported the proposed use subject to appropriate conditions of approval. 2. Are the overall site plan, circulation design, and trash enclosure/delivery area layout acceptable? The Commission unanimously concurred the proposed site plan, circulation, and trash/delivery area were acceptable with appropriately screening and landscaping in keeping with the rural character of the area. 3. Is the tree removal and proposed landscaping along Dublin Canyon Road appropriate? The Commission requested the applicant try to save trees where possible and provide additional information on whether the proposed utilities along Dublin Canyon Road would require the trees to be removed or if the utility plan could be modified. In addition, the Commission asked that the landscaping along Dublin Canyon Road be carefully reviewed to verify the parking would be adequately screened. One Commissioner suggested additional screening such as low screening walls should be considered if landscaping would not adequately screen the parking lot. 4(a). Does the Planning Commission support the proposed building architecture and detailing, design, colors, and materials? Commissioners unanimously supported the proposed architecture, detailing, design, colors, and materials of the two buildings, however a Commissioner raised concerns about the massing and height of multi-purpose building in relation to the street and maintaining the rural character along Dublin Canyon Road. One Commissioner requested clarification on how far back the second-story portions of the multi-purpose building were from the front and side property lines. 4(b). Does the Planning Commission support the proposed building and dome heights? Commissioners requested additional information and justification from the applicant on the building and dome heights but were generally supportive overall.