My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
21 SUPPLEMENTAL
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2023
>
060623
>
21 SUPPLEMENTAL
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/6/2023 1:00:06 PM
Creation date
6/6/2023 12:59:24 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
6/6/2023
DESTRUCT DATE
20Y
Document Relationships
21
(Message)
Path:
\CITY CLERK\AGENDA PACKETS\2023\060623
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
71
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
L1VEP ®RE <br /> CALIFORNIA COMMENT COMPILATION AND RESPONSE <br /> C41 Section# 1.1 through 6.10 <br /> Page#1 through 23 <br /> Comment: Fails to provide any requirement for tenants or users to mitigate noise <br /> For instance:mandatory yearly noise and flight path training for all FBOs,their leases,and occupants <br /> For instance:signing of a"pledge"to comply with flight path guidelines <br /> There is nothing on this.This is unacceptable. <br /> R41 See R5 <br /> Comment noted.No specific alternative language or deletions provided. <br /> C42 Section# 1.1 through 6.10 <br /> Page#1 through 23 <br /> Comment: Fails to implement the Livermore City Council Resolution of March 23,2010 <br /> "Shall take NO action to SOLICIT OR ENCOURAGE DEVELOPMENT of a large scale, stand-alone <br /> air cargo operator at the Livermore Airport." <br /> Not one word on this in the entire Policy.This is unacceptable. <br /> R42 See R7 <br /> Comment noted.No specific alternative language or deletions provided. <br /> C43 Section# 1.1 through 6.10 <br /> Page#1 through 23 <br /> Comment: Fails to implement the Livermore City Council Resolution of March 23,2010 <br /> "The City does not intend to extend the existing runways." <br /> There is nothing in the Airport Development Policy about this. <br /> Never even mentioned. <br /> This is unacceptable. <br /> R43 See R7 <br /> Comment noted.No specific alternative Ian«uatle or deletions provided. <br /> C44 Section# 1.1 through 6.10 <br /> Page#1 through 23 <br /> Comment: Fails to implement the Livermore City Council Resolution of March 23,2010 <br /> "The city will AGGRESSIVELY FOSTER the REDUCTION of aircraft NOISE"(emphasis mine) <br /> There is nothing in the Airport Development Policy about this.Nothing. <br /> How will review of development proposals evaluate noise impacts? <br /> What are the standards,the requirements,the goals? <br /> The Airport Development Policy doesn't have a single word about this. <br /> Not.One.Word. <br /> A new development could ramp up noise WITHOUT LIMIT,according to this Policy. <br /> This is unacceptable. <br /> This is complete and utter disregard for the City and the public. <br /> R44 See R7 <br /> Comment noted.No specific alternative language or deletions provided. <br /> Commenter#13 <br /> C45 Section#2.1 <br /> Comment: Unsolicited Interest <br /> •Issue:Must not be under NDA as that removes all transparency. <br /> •Information Secrecy:All information must be provided publicly without NDA/confidential at all stages <br /> except for any financial information <br /> R45 See RI I <br /> Comment Compilation and Response 11 <br /> City of Livermore, Livermore Municipal Airport (06/05/2023) <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.