Laserfiche WebLink
L1VERM®RE <br /> CALIFORNIA COMMENT COMPILATION AND RESPONSE <br /> C36 Section#2.1 <br /> Page#3-4 <br /> Comment: Fails to implement the Livermore City Council Resolution of March 23,2010 <br /> Redevelopment at the airport shall ONLY occur if the Airport Advisory Commission determines that the <br /> existing facilities are in NEED of SIGNIFICANT rehabilitation, improvement, or replacement." <br /> (emphasis mine) <br /> This Policy ignores the City resolution. There is not one word about this in this Policy. This is <br /> unacceptable. <br /> R36 See R7 <br /> Comment noted.No specific alternative language or deletions provided. <br /> C37 Section#2.9 <br /> Page#7 <br /> Comment: Fails to specify noise impacts. <br /> Noise impacts get zero consideration in this Policy.This is unacceptable. <br /> In fact this is shocking.This Policy spells out 15 different grounds for rejecting an application or proposal. <br /> 15 different grounds,yet NOT ONE of them concerns noise impacts. <br /> R37 See R5 <br /> Comment noted.No specific alternative language or deletions provided. <br /> C38 Section#3.2 <br /> Page#9 <br /> Comment: Fails to even mention a major environmental quality issue:noise. <br /> This Policy does not specify a single means or requirement or standard about this impact.Nothing. <br /> This is unacceptable. <br /> R38 See R5 <br /> Comment noted.No specific alternative language or deletions provided. <br /> C39 Section#3.3 <br /> Page#9 <br /> Comment: Fails to specify ANY policy regarding noise. <br /> This section features much discussion of not "overburdening the land" and providing the "highest and <br /> best use".Yet not one word on noise impacts. <br /> Think about it: is ramping up the noise that hundreds of thousands <br /> of residents experience every day,the"highest and best use"? <br /> Yet this section does not even mention noise impacts. <br /> There's nothing on total noise,nothing on trends,nothing on single noise events,nothing on adhering to <br /> the night time curfew. <br /> This is unacceptable. <br /> R39 R5 <br /> Comment noted.No specific alternative language or deletions provided. <br /> C40 Section# 1.1 through 6.10 <br /> Page#1 through 23 <br /> Comment:Fails to say a thing about noise impacts. <br /> Nothing on increased air traffic, larger or noisier planes. Nothing on more planes at lower altitudes, or <br /> more takeoffs and landings.Nothing on flight paths over residential areas.Nothing whatsoever. <br /> But airport development could affect any and all of these. <br /> For instance: a development that adds 150 flights a day of screaming loud luxury jets flying low over <br /> neighborhoods,this Policy doesn't have one word to say about that. <br /> This Policy literally has more to say about garbage can lids(they must be securely fastened)than about <br /> an issue that impacts quality of life of over 100,000 people every day. <br /> This is unacceptable.This is shocking. <br /> R40 See R5 <br /> Comment noted.No specific alternative language or deletions provided. <br /> Comment Compilation and Response 10 <br /> City of Livermore, Livermore Municipal Airport (06/05/2023) <br />