21 SUPPLEMENTAL - Laserfiche WebLink

L1\7E1 ®RE CALIFORNIA COMMENT COMPILATION AND RESPONSE C46 City Initiative •This is most worrisome-the city can decide that it wants to put out an RFP/RFI/RFQ without consent from the Airport commission,City council,or any public hearings for anything i.e.pretty much anything that Livermore Airport Staff want to do. I talks about making arrangements without having the airport staff,airport commission,other city officials--this is absolutely should not be allowed! •For example,agreements MOU that could be agreed to with just council and omitting many of the other participants could be" •Cargo base for companies like Amazon •FBO with major jet operations(i.e.,737 maintenance,or major jet port hangers and FBO Is this correct? • The City Initiative process should clearly state and reference the 2010 Livermore Resolution which indicates the terms for the initiative: • "Future development at the airport shall only occur in response to existing aviation demand. Whether demand exists shall be evaluated by the airport advisory commission and shall be based on tangible evidence...." •"Redevelopment at the airport shall only occur if the Airport Advisory Commission determines that the existing facilities are in need of significant rehabilitation,improvement,or replacement" • A City Initiative should NOT be (as in the draft document) - "if Airport land/ improvements exist or become available" R46 See R7 Comment noted.No specific alternative language or deletions provided. C47 •Information secrecy: All information must be provided publicly without NDA/confidential at all stages except for any financial information R47 See R I 1 C48 ALL Sections:Overall Public Notification and Feedback on any proposal (applies to all sections) ISSUE: Lack of any Public notification and feedback at any stage is not explicitly indicated in the document • For example, during and after the interest or MOU has been negotiated and signed by the City and Applicant •There is no public notification/comment of this happening •After the MOU is signed,the Concept Plan is sent to the City—there is no public notification or comment period on this concept plan •The public should be notified and have provision for review/feedback at every step: •Upon unsolicited interest •Prior to MOU approval •Prior to Concept Plan approval •At application submission time •Prior to application approval time •The onus of notification should fall on the applicant(mailers to airport surrounding community).Putting the draft on airports website cannot be considered as public notification as one can't expect people to go and keep checking airports website each week. R48 See R4 Comment noted.No specific alternative language or deletions provided. C49 Section 3.2 Environmental Quality • ISSUE: There is no mention of Noise which is the major environmental quality issue facing the valley with the airport •Noise is a major environmental factor and the fact that this is not here?Very concerns that the airport is not taking this seriously--this is a serious omission R49 See R5 Comment noted.No specific alternative language or deletions provided. Comment Compilation and Response 12 City of Livermore, Livermore Municipal Airport (06/05/2023) 1