My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
5_Exhibit B_Resolution_Attachment 2
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2020 - PRESENT
>
2023
>
05-10
>
5_Exhibit B_Resolution_Attachment 2
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/4/2023 3:15:58 PM
Creation date
5/4/2023 3:12:34 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
RESOLUTIONS
DOCUMENT DATE
5/10/2023
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
Document Relationships
5
(Superseded by)
Path:
\BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS\PLANNING\AGENDA PACKETS\2020 - PRESENT\2023\05-10
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
541
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br /> <br />12 <br />Dissimilarity Index Guidance for Cities with Small Racial Group Populations <br />The analysis conducted for this report suggests that dissimilarity index <br />values are unreliable for a population group if that group represents <br />approximately less than 5% of the jurisdiction’s total population. <br />HCD’s AFFH guidance requires the Housing Element to include the <br />dissimilarity index values for racial groups, but also offers flexibility in <br />emphasizing the importance of various measures. ABAG/MTC <br />recommends that when cities have population groups that are less than <br />5% of the jurisdiction’s population (see Table 4), jurisdiction staff use the <br />isolation index or Thiel’s H-Index to gain a more accurate understanding <br />of their jurisdiction’s neighborhood-level segregation patterns (intra-city <br />segregation). <br />If a jurisdiction has a very small population of a racial group, this indicates <br />that segregation between the jurisdiction and the region (inter-city <br />segregation) is likely to be an important feature of the jurisdiction’s <br />segregation patterns. <br />In City of Pleasanton, the Black/African American group is 1.7 percent of <br />the population - so staff should be aware of this small population size <br />when evaluating dissimilarity index values involving this group. <br />Table 2 below provides the dissimilarity index values indicating the level of segregation in Pleasanton <br />between white residents and residents who are Black, Latinx, or Asian/Pacific Islander. The table also <br />provides the dissimilarity index between white residents and all residents of color in the jurisdiction, <br />and all dissimilarity index values are shown across three time periods (2000, 2010, and 2020). <br />In Pleasanton the highest segregation is between Black and white residents (see Table 2). Pleasanton’s <br />Black /white dissimilarity index of 0.306 means that 30.6% of Black (or white) residents would need to <br />move to a different neighborhood to create perfect integration between Black residents and white <br />residents. However, local jurisdiction staff should note that this dissimilarity index value is not a <br />reliable data point due to small population size. See callout box above for more information. <br />The “Bay Area Average” column in this table provides the average dissimilarity index values for these <br />racial group pairings across Bay Area jurisdictions in 2020. The data in this column can be used as a <br />comparison to provide context for the levels of segregation between communities of color are from <br />white residents in this jurisdiction. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.