5_Exhibit B_Resolution_Attachment 2

Housing Constraints City of Pleasanton | C-37 Table C-11 compares the City’s development impact fees to the neighboring jurisdictions of Livermore and Dublin (excluding outside agency fees). Table C-11: Development Impact Fees Comparison1 Development Fee Pleasanton Livermore Dublin Affordable Housing Single-family: $46,076 2 Multi-family: $45,083 3 Affordable housing: $0 $29.23 per s.f. (e.g., $75,998 for a 2,600 s.f. home); must build on-site units for 10+ units $217,696 Capital Facilities Single-family: $17,430 4 Multi-family: $12,419 Single-family and 4-bd multi- family: $21,155 Multi-family (2-bd): $16,221 Senior: $3,599 6 Single-family and townhome: $27,574 Multi-family: $16,832 Senior: $10,022 Transportation Single-family: $9,908 5 Multi-family: $6,092 Affordable housing: $469 Single-family: $10,546 Multi-family (2-bd): $7,110 Senior: $3,236 Varies: $3,384 to $9,408 1 All fees are per dwelling unit unless otherwise noted. 2 Applies to single-family units over 1,500 square feet. 3 Applies to single-family units 1,500 square feet or less. 4 Applies to detached single-family units. 5 Applies to single-family and townhouse units. 6 These are Park Facilities Fees. Source: City of Pleasanton Community Development Department, Development Fees Handout, March 20, 2021; City of Livermore Development Impact and Connection Fees (July 1,2021); City of Dublin Impact Fees FY 2021-22 The City’s impact fees are lower or comparable to neighboring jurisdictions. When the City Council adopted impact fees, some fees were established below the maximum amounts justified by nexus studies so that the fees were competitive with neighboring jurisdictions. However, in some cases the adopted fees are well below those maximum amounts, and the levels established by neighboring jurisdictions, which reduces the City’s ability to collect fees from market-rate projects to support affordable housing goals, and to fund necessary infrastructure. And, although the Affordable Housing Fee does reflect a differentiation in fee levels based on unit size, the differences are minimal. Considering fees on a per square foot basis could help to encourage more production of smaller units. Pursuant to this, and in accordance with AB 1505, the Housing Element includes a program to review fees (for residential and non-residential development) and consider adjusting them upwards, if doing so would not unduly constrain new investment, and with the next update of the nexus studies, to study imposing impact fees for residential uses on a per-square-foot basis (Program 2.3).