3_Exhibit C_ADDENDUM ONLY - Laserfiche WebLink

City of Pleasanton—Stoneridge Mall Residential Project CEQA Checklist Section 15183 Checklist/15164 Addendum 78 FirstCarbon Solutions Https://adecinnovations.sharepoint.com/sites/PublicationsSite/Shared Documents/Publications/Client (PN-JN)/2148/21480017/Consistency Checklist/21480017 Stoneridge Mall Residential Project Checklist Addendum_Updated.docx habitat for special-status species or other species of concern. As such, the Prior EIR included MM 4.C-2 which requires identification of a development setback in applicable riparian areas to protect waterways, their associated riparian habitat, and any potential special species habitat from impacts. Analysis of Proposed Project The proposed project would not result in new or more severe impacts than identified in the Prior EIR. The proposed project site does not contain any riparian habitat or other sensitive natural community. Therefore, there are no environmental effects that are peculiar to the proposed project or the parcels on which the proposed project would be located. Because there would be no impacts, the proposed project would not result in a new or more severe adverse impact that was not previously identified in the Prior EIR. c) Adverse Effect on State or Federally Protected Wetlands Prior EIR Conclusions This topic is discussed under Impact 4.C-2 of the Prior EIR, which concluded that no formal wetland delineation had been carried out in support of the proposed Housing Element since there are no wetlands or other waters present on any of the potential sites for rezoning. The Prior EIR found that there was no documentation of seasonal wetlands at any of the undeveloped sites (Sites 6, 7, 8, 18, 19, and 20). Additionally, there was no evidence of wetlands observed during site surveys conducted by an Environmental Science Associates (ESA) Biologist in July 2011 or through a review of current or historical aerials. The Prior EIR concluded that there may be wetlands present within the historical channel of Sycamore Creek on the northern boundary of Site 20. However, it was determined that direct impacts to any wetlands within the Sycamore Creek channel and the Arroyo del Valle riparian corridor would be avoided through the implementation of the riparian setbacks specified in MM 4.C- 2. Therefore, the Prior EIR concluded that there would be no adverse impacts on State or federally protected wetlands as a result of the development of the Housing Element. Analysis of Proposed Project The proposed project site is already developed and does not contain State or federally protected wetlands or other waters. It would not result in new or more severe impacts than identified in the Prior EIR. Therefore, there are no environmental effects that are peculiar to the proposed project or the parcels on which the proposed project would be located. Because there would be no impacts, the proposed project would not result in a new or more severe adverse impact that was not previously identified in the Prior EIR. d) Movement of Resident or Migratory Fish Prior EIR Conclusions The Prior EIR found that the proposed project is not anticipated to substantially modify established migration or dispersal corridors. However, because some projects would be located near arroyos,