3_Exhibit C_ADDENDUM ONLY - Laserfiche WebLink

City of Pleasanton—Stoneridge Mall Residential Project CEQA Checklist Section 15183 Checklist/15164 Addendum 108 FirstCarbon Solutions Https://adecinnovations.sharepoint.com/sites/PublicationsSite/Shared Documents/Publications/Client (PN-JN)/2148/21480017/Consistency Checklist/21480017 Stoneridge Mall Residential Project Checklist Addendum_Updated.docx Emission Source Year 2025 Total Emissions MT CO2e per year1 (biogenic CO2 are not included) Waste 53 Water 42 Total Project Emissions 1,572 Notes: MT CO2e = metric tons of carbon dioxide equivalent Totals may not add up due to rounding. Source: CalEEMod Output (Appendix B). This summary of the construction and operational GHG emissions is provided for informational purposes only. The proposed project’s consistency with City’s CAP 2.0 and ARB’s Scoping Plan are analyzed in the following impact discussion VIII.(b) to demonstrate that the proposed project has a less than significant impact with respect to GHG emissions due to the project’s consistency with the City’s CAP 2.0, per recommendations included under the BAAQMD 2022 GHG thresholds of significance. Therefore, there are no environmental effects that are peculiar to the proposed project or the parcels on which the proposed project would be located. Impacts would be less than significant and the proposed project would not result in a new or more severe adverse impact that was not previously identified in the Prior EIR. b) Conflict with Applicable Plan Prior EIR Conclusions The Prior EIR (Impact 4.E-2) stated that the then proposed Housing Element; Climate Action Plan; General Plan; and rezoning of sites could potentially conflict with an applicable plan, policy or regulation of an appropriate regulatory agency adopted for the purpose of reducing GHG emissions. The Prior EIR determined that previous plans would achieve the level of emissions reductions targeted in AB 32 as interpreted for local jurisdiction by the BAAQMD. Specifically, the Prior EIR determined that the previous plans would improve the local jobs-housing balance (resulting in VMT reductions) and provide for additional GHG emissions mitigation, such that buildout of the General Plan, as it is proposed to be amended, would not conflict with AB 32 or any other plan, policy or regulation regarding GHG emissions. Analysis of Proposed Project As many of the regulatory plans have been updated since the Prior EIR, this project is analyzed based on updated regulations and policies. As discussed above, this impact is evaluated based on the proposed project’s consistency with the City’s CAP 2.0 and ARB’s Scoping Plan. Table 10 below identifies CAP 2.0 strategies and provides a consistency analysis for the proposed project. Per the BAAQMD 2022 GHG thresholds of significance, a project would have a less than significant impact if consistent with a qualified GHG reduction strategy, such as the City’s CAP 2.0.